A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticism — John Shaqi
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
Here one of the first very important differences of interpretation
comes in. Professor Butcher would translate ζῷον “picture,” as though
it were short for ζῷον γεγραμμένον. Scholars differ whether the word
_can_ by itself have this meaning, and on such a point I have no
pretensions to decide. But its more common sense is certainly “living
organism,” and I feel certain that this is the only meaning which
makes full critical sense here. To begin with, Aristotle has just used
it in this way, and in the second place the analogy of another _art_
would come in very ill. We want a comparison drawn from _nature_, to
give us the law for the imitation of nature.
We have, however, to go further. Not only must the action of tragedy be
complete and probable, but it must deal with terrible and pitiful
things: if these surprise us, so much the better. After distinguishing
between simple plots (without Revolution and Discovery) or complex (with
them), and describing these two elements at more length, he attacks, in
a rather suspected passage, the Parts—Prologue, Episode, Exodus,[41] the
choric part, &c.—and then, preferring the complex scheme, shows how it
is to be managed. The hero must not blamelessly pass from prosperity to
adversity, nor blamefully in the opposite direction. He must be a person
of considerable position, who by some error or weakness (ἁμαρτία) comes
to misfortune. Also the special kind of pity and terror which is to be
employed to make him interesting, the _oikeia hedone_ of tragedy, is
most important, not a few examples being taken in illustration from the
great tragedians.
Footnote 41:
“Episode” is here defined in quite a new sense as the dialogue
_between_ choruses; “Exodus” as that which no chorus follows. The
chapter is doubtful—or something more.
Then we pass to Character. It must be good—even a woman is good
sometimes—it must be appropriate, true to life, and consistent.
Probability is here as important as in Action; the _Deus ex machina_ is
to be used with extreme caution. After turning to the details of
Discovery, and dealing with Gesture, Scene, &c., he goes to the two main
stages of Tragedy, _desis_ and _lusis_, Twisting and Unravelling, and to
its four kinds (an extension of his former classification)—Simple,
Complex, Pathetic, and Ethical. And the tragic poet is especially warned
against Tragedy with an Epic structure—that is to say, a variety of
plots. The Chorus must bear part in the action, and not give mere
interludes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account