A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 2 (of 3), From the Renaissance to the decline of eighteenth century orthodoxySaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 2 (of 3), From the Renaissance to the decline of eighteenth century orthodoxy
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
Ronsard uses “cæsura” for “elision,” a catachresis in which he had
followers, and which even affected Dryden. Greek and Roman proper names
are, where possible, to be frenchified in termination. “The old words of
our romances” (this is of the first importance) are not to be ejected,
but to be chosen with care and prudence. Terms of art and technical
similes are to be sought out with extreme diligence, so as to supply
life and nerve to the book. Dialect-words may be used at need; the
example of the Greeks being invoked here—perhaps a little rashly.
Invention, says Ronsard, is the working of the Imagination; but he seems
still inclined to the old limitation of this word to the retailing of
images, and reprobates more strongly than is perhaps necessary or
desirable _ces inventions fantastiques et mélancholiques qui ne se
rapportent non plus l’une à l’autre que les songes entrecoupés des
frénétiques_. There is to be first of all (note the Frenchman) Order and
Disposition in poetical devices.
-----
Footnote 174:
_Ed. cit._, vii. 317-337
Footnote 175:
Alphonse Delbène, Abbé of Haute-Combe in Savoy.
-----
This order and this disposition are to be secured by a happy nature in
the first place, and by a careful study of good models in the second.
Among these good models, “those who have illustrated our language in the
last fifteen years” (_i.e._, since the _Défense_) are to be counted in;
and (this was added later) foreign modern languages are also to be
carefully studied for the enriching of the mother tongue. “Elocution” is
nothing else than “a propriety and splendour of words well chosen, and
ornamented with grave and short sentences, which make verses shine, like
as do precious stones, well mounted, the fingers of some great
seignior.”[176] The vocabulary must be copious and composed of
well-sifted words, with plentiful description and comparison, moulded
specially on Homer. The common form of “great” poem-making follows, with
reference to Aristotle as well as Horace, with caution against trite and
otiose epithets, against epithet-strings _à l’Italienne_, but with a
strong praise of the _mot propre_. Rhyme is treated rather briefly; and
then Ronsard drops to minutiæ of _e_'s and _h_'s, discusses Alexandrines
(which, in a later edition, he says he should have employed in the
_Franciade_ but for powerful command) and “common” (decasyllabic) verse,
and others, passes to some grammatical and orthographical cautions, and
ends with the promise, unluckily never fulfilled, of a longer _Poetic_
some day.
-----
Footnote 176:
“Jewels five words long
That on the stretched forefinger of all time
Sparkle for ever.”
—TENNYSON, _The Princess_.
-----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account