A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 2 (of 3), From the Renaissance to the decline of eighteenth century orthodoxySaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 2 (of 3), From the Renaissance to the decline of eighteenth century orthodoxy
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
Savonarola’s remarks, which are contained in his four-book tractate, _De
Scientiis_,[21] are more curious than really important. Yet they derive
some importance from the great name and influence of their propounder,
from his position at the very watershed, so to speak, of time in Europe,
if not in Italy, dividing Middle Age from Renaissance, and from the fact
that they undoubtedly summarise that dubitative, if not utterly hostile,
view of literature in general, and of poetry in particular, which, as we
have seen,[22] was borrowed by the Fathers from the ancients, and very
much intensified by the borrowers. Fra Girolamo’s attitude is a rigidly
scholastic one; and to those who omit to take account of this, or do not
understand it, his view must seem wholly out of focus, if not wholly
obscure. Poetry is a part of Rational Philosophy; and therefore its
object must be _pars entis rationis_. It differs from Rhetoric in
working purely by Example, not Enthymeme. Its end is to induce men to
live virtuously by decent representations; and as the soul loves
harmony, it uses harmonic forms. But a poet who merely knows how to play
gracefully with feet only deserves the name as an old woman deserves
that of a pretty girl.[23] Still more preposterous is the habit of
calling poetry “divine.” Cosmos becomes chaos, if you admit that.
_Scientia autem divina est cujus objectum Deus: non illa cujus objectum
exemplum._ The making of verses is only poetry _per accidens_; and as
for the Heathen poets, _magnus diaboli laqueus absconditus est_ in them.
He does not, he says, actually “damn” poetry; but the gist of his
tractatule is that poets as a rule quite misunderstand their function,
and that poetry had better keep its place, and abstain from silly, not
to say blasphemous, airs.
-----
Footnote 21:
Otherwise, _De Divisione et Utilitate Omnium Scientiarum_. I have read
this in the Wittemberg ed. of his _Philosophiæ Epitome_ (1596, 8vo).
The passages quoted and referred to will be found at p. 807 _sq._ of
this.
Footnote 22:
Vol. i. p. 380 _sq._
Footnote 23:
Or, “a pretty old woman that of a girl,” the position of the epithet
between the two nouns being ambiguous.
-----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account