A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
The few contributions, shortly supplemented from MS., to Southey’s
_Omniana_ give little, but the volume now entitled _Miscellanies,
Æsthetic and Literary_, is very nearly all ours. Much of it, however, is
repetition in apparent title, and a good deal of the rest does not quite
answer expectations. The general _Essays on the Fine Arts_ with which it
opens (and of which the author, who had lost them, entertained that
perhaps rather exaggerated idea which we usually entertain of lost
loves, books, fishes, &c.) possess in abundance Coleridge’s uniquely
stimulating quality, but, perhaps in not much less abundance, his
extreme desultoriness and want of definition, save of the most
indefinite character. The essay on the _Prometheus_ which follows
excites (though hardly in the wary mind, Estesianly “alphabeted,” as he
would himself say) great expectations. But it is scarcely too much to
say that on this—the most purely poetical of all extant Greek dramas, a
miracle of sublimity and humanity mingled, and the twin pillar, with the
_Agamemnon_, of its author’s claim to be one of the greatest poets of
the world—Coleridge has not a word to say that even touches the poetry.
He is philosophico-mythological from the egg to the apple; and one is
bound to add that he here shows one of his gravest drawbacks as a
critic. The new fragments, however, of the 1818 lectures are full of
good matter, on Cervantes especially, perhaps a little less specially on
Dante, on Robinson Crusoe very particularly indeed, on Rabelais and
Sterne and Donne: while these are taken up and multiplied in interest by
the “Marginalia,” with which the literary part of the book concludes,
and which contain, on Daniel and Chapman and Selden, Browne and Fuller,
Fielding and Junius, some of the best known and nearly of the best of
their author’s critical work. Here also, and here only, do we find much
on Milton, Coleridge’s rather numerous lectures on him having left
surprisingly little trace. He is, though a fervent admirer, not quite at
his happiest.
[Sidenote: _The Lecture_ On Style.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account