A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
The Eighth, with many excellent examples of the usual
seventeenth-eighteenth century _causeries_, and with a most welcome
batch of mediæval studies on Joinville, on the _Roman de Renart_, on the
_Histoire Littéraire_—good to read even now, and priceless then—contains
an article, written with great care, to which an Englishman naturally
turns, and with which most Englishmen will be disappointed, that on
Gibbon. None of the usual causes could have blunted Sainte-Beuve’s
judgment here: yet it is blunted. Missing, in the one sense, what he
calls the _javelot_, the _coup de foudre_, the _cri haletant_—in other
words, the somewhat theatrical and rhetorical[602] touch of French, he
misses also, in the other, Gibbon’s _magnificence_, that sense of the
vast procession of events and that power of reproducing it, which gives
an almost poetic self-transcendence to an otherwise prosaic and
_philosophe_ nature. We all miss things, of course: but such a man as
Sainte-Beuve should not have missed such a thing as this. The
“Joinville,” however, which immediately follows, makes once more those
familiar amends; and the next volume (the Ninth) contains admirable
companions to it in the “Froissart” and the “Villehardouin,” this last
one of the author’s best. He had now started (to some though not to all
extents with advantage) dealing with one subject in several essays: and
most of this volume is so occupied. “Stendhal,” “Marivaux,” “Madame
Dacier,” with others, show his admirable flexibility. The Tenth is
perhaps less attractive, for except Agrippa d’Aubigné and one or two
others, its subjects are not as a rule of the first interest, and in one
Sainte-Beuve returns to Chateaubriand—not happily. But the Eleventh,
with a certain amount of “filling,”—the first collection stopped here,
and Sainte-Beuve had to plug the gap made by the removal of the index
when it was extended,—has at least two articles, or batches of articles,
of the first interest—those on Montluc and Cowper. _Ne fait pas ce tour
qui veut_—to appreciate equally, and almost at the same moment, the
greater d’Artagnan of Sienna and the patron of Puss.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account