A History of English VersificationSchipper, J. (Jakob)
History
A History of English Versification
Schipper, J. (Jakob)
English language -- Versification; English poetry -- History and criticism
The rhymed five-foot verse was known in English poetry as far back as
the second half of the thirteenth century, and has been a favourite
metre from Chaucer's first poetic attempts onward to the present, whilst
the blank verse was first introduced into English literature about the
year 1540 by the Earl of Surrey (1518-47), and has been frequently
employed ever since that time. The rhymed five-foot verse was, and has
continued to be, mainly preferred for lyrical and epic, the blank verse
for dramatic poetry. The latter, however, has been employed e.g. by
Milton, and after him by Thomson and many others for the epic and allied
species of poetry; while rhymed five-foot verse was used during a
certain period for dramatic poetry, e.g. by Davenant and Dryden, but by
the latter only for a short time.
=Rhymed five-accent verse= occurs in Middle English both in poems
composed in stanza form and (since Chaucer's _Legend of Good Women_, c.
1386) in couplets.
This metre, apart from differences in the length of the line and in
number of accents, is by no means to be looked upon as different from
the remaining even-stressed metres of that time. For, like the Middle
English four-foot verse and the Alexandrine, it derives its origin from
a French source, its prototype being the French decasyllabic verse. This
is a metre with rising rhythm, in which the caesura generally comes
after the fourth syllable, as e.g. in the line:
_Ja mais n'iert tels | com fut as anceisors._ Saint Alexis, l. 5.
To this verse the following line of Chaucer's corresponds
exactly in point of structure:
_A kníght ther wás, | and thát a wórthy mán._
Cant. Tales, Prol. 43.
§ =152.= The English verse, like the French decasyllabic, admits
feminine caesuras and feminine line-endings, and the first thesis
(anacrusis) may be absent; there are, therefore, sixteen varieties
theoretically possible.
I. Principal Types.
1. ⏑ – ⏑ – | ⏑ – ⏑ – ⏑ 10 syll.
2. ⏑ – ⏑ – ⏑ | ⏑ – ⏑ – ⏑ – 11 "
3. ⏑ – ⏑ – | ⏑ – ⏑ – ⏑ – ⏑ 11 "
4. ⏑ – ⏑ – ⏑ | ⏑ – ⏑ – ⏑ – ⏑ 12 "
II. With Initial Truncation
(omission of the first thesis).
5. – ⏑ – | ⏑ – ⏑ – ⏑ – 9 syll.
6. – ⏑ – ⏑ | ⏑ – ⏑ – ⏑ – 10 "
7. – ⏑ – | ⏑ – ⏑ – ⏑ – ⏑ 10 "
8. – ⏑ – ⏑ | ⏑ – ⏑ – ⏑ – ⏑ 11 "
III. With Internal Truncation
(omission of the thesis after
the caesura).
9. ⏑ – ⏑ – | – ⏑ – ⏑ – 9 syll.
10. ⏑ – ⏑ – ⏑ | – ⏑ – ⏑ – 10 "
11. ⏑ – ⏑ – | – ⏑ – ⏑ – ⏑ 10 "
12. ⏑ – ⏑ – ⏑ | – ⏑ – ⏑ – ⏑ 11 "
IV. With both Initial and Internal
Truncation.
13. – ⏑ – | – ⏑ – ⏑ – 8 syll.
14. – ⏑ – ⏑ | – ⏑ – ⏑ – 9 "
15. – ⏑ – | – ⏑ – ⏑ – ⏑ 9 "
16. – ⏑ – ⏑ | – ⏑ – ⏑ – ⏑ 10 "
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account