A History of Epidemics in Britain, Volume 2 (of 2): From the Extinction of Plague to the Present TimeCreighton, Charles
History
A History of Epidemics in Britain, Volume 2 (of 2): From the Extinction of Plague to the Present Time
Creighton, Charles
Epidemics -- Great Britain -- History
It has not been usual to think of spotted fever, (or of influenzas), in
that connexion; but a telluric source of the epidemic constitution of
1685-86 was clearly Sydenham’s view; and as the fever came in
circumstances like those of the last great plague, and was thought at the
time to be the forerunner of another great plague, its connexion with
recondite decompositions in the soil, dependent on the phenomenal drought
of two whole years before, cannot be set aside as a possibility, the less
so that the fever, although of the type of typhus, was not a fever of
cold, hunger, and domestic distress, but mainly of the warm, or mild, or
soft weather following the long drought, and of many well-to-do-people, as
in the great Netherlands fever of 1669. My view of it is that it was the
modified successor of plague, the _pestis mitior_, which used to precede
and accompany the plague, now become the dominant constitution. The
authentic figures of its mortality come from London; but Sydenham says
that its “effects were felt far more in other places”; although Short’s
abstracts of parish registers, given above, do not indicate excessive
mortality throughout England.
Retrospect of the great Fever of 1623-25.
The most instructive instance of _pestis mitior_ in Britain is not the
pestilential fever which led up to the last plague (1665-6), but the great
epidemic of fever all over England and Scotland which reigned for two or
three years before the great outburst of plague in 1625. I go back to this
because it was not wholly or even mainly a famine fever (although it was
as general as one of the medieval famine-fevers), and because in that
respect it furnishes a close parallel to the fever of 1685-86, which I
regard as the successor of the plague. After this interlude in the
history, we shall proceed to consider the question of the final extinction
of plague.
In Scotland the fever of 1622-23 was directly connected with famine,
but in England it was not obviously so according to the records that
remain. The dearth in Scotland began as early as the autumn of 1621:
“Great skarsitie of cornes throw all the kingdome,” the harvest having
been spoiled by wet weather and unheard of river floods; however,
abundance of foreign victual came in, and the scarcity was got
over[40]. In England the same harvest of oats was abundant, and
probably yielded the “foreign victual” which relieved the Scots; but
the price of wheat rose greatly[41]. It was the year following, 1622,
that really brought famine and famine-sickness to Scotland, as the
second of two bad harvests had always done. On 21 July, 1622, a fast
was proclaimed at Aberdeen for “the present plague of dearth and
famine, and the continuance thereof threatened by tempests,
inundations and weets likely to rot the fruit on the ground[42].”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account