A History of Epidemics in Britain, Volume 2 (of 2): From the Extinction of Plague to the Present TimeCreighton, Charles
History
A History of Epidemics in Britain, Volume 2 (of 2): From the Extinction of Plague to the Present Time
Creighton, Charles
Epidemics -- Great Britain -- History
In an entry of the Chronicle of Perth, subsequent to July, 1622, it is
said: “In this yeir about the harvest and efter, thair wes suche ane
universall seikness in all the countrie as the ellyke hes not bene
hard of. But speciallie in this burgh, that no familie in all the
citie was frie of this visitation. Thair was also great mortalitie
amonge the poore.” From which it appears that the autumnal fever of
1622 was among all classes in Scotland. The famine in Scotland became
more acute in the spring and summer of 1623; the country swarmed with
beggars, and in July, says Calderwood, the famine increased daily
until “many, both in burgh and land, died of hunger.” At Perth ten or
twelve died every day from Midsummer to Michaelmas; the disease was
not the plague, but a fever[43]. At Dumfries 492 died during the first
ten months of 1623, perhaps a ninth part of the inhabitants, about one
hundred of the deaths being specially marked as of “poor[44].” The
“malignant spotted fever” which caused numerous deaths in 1623 in
Wigton, Penrith and Kendal is clearly part of the famine-fever of
Scotland extending to the Borders and crossing them. This is a
famine-fever of the old medieval type, like that of 1196 which,
according to William of Newburgh “crept about everywhere,” always the
same acute fever, putting an end to the miseries of the starving, but
attacking also those who had food.
The same spotted fever was all over England in 1623, but it did not,
as in Scotland, come in the wake of famine. It is true that the
English harvest of 1622 was a good deal spoiled; a letter of 25
September says[45]: “Though the latter part of this summer proved so
far seasonable, yet the harvest is scant, and corn at a great price by
reason of the mildews and blasting generally over the whole realm,”
rye being quoted a few weeks later at 7/- the bushel and wheat at
10/-, although the average of wheat for the year, in Rogers’s tables,
is not more than 51/1_d._ per quarter, while the average of next year
falls to 37/8_d._ These were not famine-prices in England, and there
is no evidence of general sickness directly after the harvest of 1622,
when corn was dearest. Also, although the autumn of 1623 was a time of
“continual wet” in England[46], the price of wheat remained moderate,
and even low as compared with the rather stiff price of the winter of
1622-23. But it was not until the summer and autumn of 1623 that the
spotted fever became epidemic in England. Short’s abstracts of the
registers of market towns show how sickly that year was:
Year. No. of No. with Buried Baptised
registers excess of in the in the
examined. burials. same. same.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account