Gomperz, _op. cit._, II, 133; Zeller (_op. cit._, II, 1, 323 f.) is not sure that the Cynics taught a positive anti-slavery doctrine, but cf. p. 132, n. 2. Footnote 936: Diog. L. vi. 66, 74 f.; cf. Epict. _Dissert._ iii. 24. 67. Footnote 937: _Athen._ iv. 159_c_; Διογένης δ᾽ ἐν τῇ πολιτείᾳ νόμισμα εἶναι νομοθετεῖ ἀστραγάλους. Footnote 938: Diog. L. vi. 72: ἔλεγε δὲ καὶ κοινὰς εἶναι δεῖν τὰς γυναῖκας, etc. Aristotle (_Pol._ ii. 7. 1266_a_34) names Plato as its sole advocate, but cf. Zeller, _op. cit._, II, 1, 321 f., n. 4, and Gomperz, _op. cit._, II, 132, though they think that he did not hold it in the extreme form stated by Diogenes Laertius. Footnote 939: There is no specific evidence, though it would accord well with his other teachings. Cf. Gomperz, _op. cit._, II, 132. Footnote 940: Called “Thebaios”; flor. _ca._ 328 B.C.; cf. Diog. L. vi. 87. Footnote 941: Mullach, _F. Ph. G._, II, 334, fr. 6; 338, frs. 38, 39; cf. also Diog. L. vi. 86. Footnote 942: Cf. _The Beggar’s Wallet_, an amusing parody of the _Odyssey_ (von Arnim, _Leben und Werke des Dio von Prusa_ [1898], 255 ff.) Gomperz (_op. cit._, II, n. 545 to p. 125) doubts its genuineness for Crates, but thinks it is from a Cynic source; cf. also _infra_ on Teles. Footnote 943: The pseudo-Aristotelian _Economics_ is a possible exception. The _Economics_ of Xenophon has a broader theme, and the _Revenues_ is for practical purposes. Footnote 944: _Pseudo-Platonica_, p. 59. Footnote 945: It is given mere passing mention in Boeckh, _op. cit._, I, 693; Hoderman, _op. cit._, p. 9; Francotte, _L’Industrie_, II, 310, n. 1; Cossa, _op. cit._, p. 146; Oncken, _op. cit._, p. 37; Bonar, _op. cit._, p. 11, n. 1; Kautz, _op. cit._, p. 121; Simey, _op. cit._, p. 474; Hagen, _Observationum oec. pol. in Aesch. dialog., qui Eryx. inscribitur_ (dissertation, 1822). The latter has not been examined. Footnote 946: On its origin, cf. Otto Schrohl, _De Eryx. qui fertur Platonis_ (dissertation, 1901) which gives a full bibliography, pp. 5 ff.; Heidel (_Pseudo-Platonica_, p. 61), following Steinhart (Mueller, VII, 14), attributes it to a later Socratic, in sympathy with Antisthenes; p. 69, n. 3, he thinks it grew out of _Euthyd._ 288E ff.; for other points of contact, cf. Schrohl, 10 ff. Footnote 947: On the first, cf. 393A-394E, 402E-403C; on the second, cf. 396E-397D, 405C-406B. Footnote 948: Cf. preceding n. 3. Footnote 949: 278E-282. Footnote 950: Cf. above, _in loc._ Footnote 951: For Stoics, cf. _infra_. Footnote 952: Xen. _Mem._ i. 6, especially end: ἐγὼ δὲ νομίζω τὸ μὲν μηδενὸς δεῖσθαι θεῖον εἶναι, etc.; cf. Schrohl, _op. cit._, pp. 26-28. Footnote 953: 400E, 401A. Footnote 954: 401A: ἀλλὰ ποῖα δὴ τῶν χρησίμων, ἐπειδή γε οὐ πάντα. Cf. also 400E. Footnote 955: 401B, 401E. Footnote 956: 402E, 393E-394E, and the general thesis that the wisest are richest.