A History of Literary Criticism in the Renaissance: With special reference to the influence of Italy in the formation and development of modern classicismSpingarn, Joel Elias
Philosophy
A History of Literary Criticism in the Renaissance: With special reference to the influence of Italy in the formation and development of modern classicism
Spingarn, Joel Elias
Criticism; Renaissance
[66] _Rhet._ i. 11.
[67] _Cf._ A. Segni, 1581, cap. i.
[68] Varchi, p. 227 _sq._
[69] Capriano, cap. ii.
[70] Lionardi, p. 43 _sq._
[71] _Lettere_, ii. 525.
[72] Scaliger, _Poet._ i. 2.
[73] _Defense_, pp. 10, 11.
[74] _De Poeta_, p. 53 _sq._
[75] Castelvetro, _Poetica_, p. 23 _sq._
[76] _Ibid._ p. 190.
[77] _Cf._ T. Tasso, xi. 51.
[78] _Poetica_, p. 158.
[79] _Poetica_, p. 191.
[80] _Ars Poet._ 333.
[81] Butcher, p. 185.
[82] Daniello, p. 25.
[83] _Ibid._ p. 40.
[84] Fracastoro, i. 363.
[85] Scaliger, _Poet._ vi. ii. 2.
[86] _De Poeta_, p. 102. _Cf._ Scaliger, _Poet._ iii. 96.
[87] _De Poeta_, p. 11.
[88] _Essay of Dramatic Poesy_, p. 104.
[89] _De Poeta_, p. 79.
[90] _Oeuvres_, vii. 318.
[91] _Works_, i. 333.
[92] _Prose Works_, iii. 118.
[93] _Characteristicks_, 1711, i. 207.
[94] H. C. Robinson, _Diary_, May 29, 1812, "Coleridge talked of the
impossibility of being a good poet without being a good man."
[95] _Defence of Poetry_, p. 42.
[96] Minturno plainly says as much, _De Poeta_, p. 105.
[97] _Geog._ i. ii. 5, as cited by Shaftesbury.
[98] _Lettere_, ii. 195.
[99] _Essay of Dramatic Poesy_, p. 104.
[100] _Cf._ Piccolomini, p. 369.
[101] Castelvetro, _Poetica_, p. 505. _Cf._ Twining, ii. 449, 450.
[102] _Poetica_, p. 29.
[103] Posnett, cited by Cook, p. 247.
[104] _Opere_, viii. 26 _sq._
[105] _Ibid._ ix. 123.
[106] _Ibid._ xii. 13.
[107] _Ibid._ xi. 50.
[108] _Ibid._ xii. 212.
CHAPTER III
THE THEORY OF THE DRAMA
ARISTOTLE'S definition of tragedy is the basis of the Renaissance theory
of tragedy. That definition is as follows: "Tragedy is an imitation of
an action that is serious, complete, and of a certain magnitude; in
language embellished with each kind of artistic ornament, the several
kinds being found in separate parts of the play; in the form of action,
not of narration; through pity and fear effecting the proper _katharsis_
or purgation of these emotions."[109]
To expand this definition, tragedy, in common with all other forms of
poetry, is the imitation of an action; but the action of tragedy is
distinguished from that of comedy in being grave and serious. The action
is complete, in so far as it possesses perfect unity; and in length it
must be of the proper magnitude. By embellished language, Aristotle
means language into which rhythm, harmony, and song enter; and by the
remark that the several kinds are to be found in separate parts of the
play, he means that some parts of tragedy are rendered through the
medium of verse alone, while others receive the aid of song. Moreover,
tragedy is distinguished from epic poetry by being in the form of
action instead of that of narration. The last portion of Aristotle's
definition describes the peculiar function of tragic performance.
I. _The Subject of Tragedy_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account