A History of Literary Criticism in the Renaissance: With special reference to the influence of Italy in the formation and development of modern classicismSpingarn, Joel Elias
Philosophy
A History of Literary Criticism in the Renaissance: With special reference to the influence of Italy in the formation and development of modern classicism
Spingarn, Joel Elias
Criticism; Renaissance
In concluding this chapter, it may be well to say a few words, and only
a few, upon the classification of poetic forms. There were during the
Renaissance numerous attempts at distinguishing these forms, but on the
whole all of them are fundamentally equivalent to that of Minturno, who
recognizes three _genres_,--the lyric or melic, the dramatic or scenic,
and the epic or narrative. This classification is essentially that of
the Greeks, and it has lasted down to this very day. With lyric poetry
this essay is scarcely concerned, for during the Renaissance there was
no systematic lyric theory. Those who discussed it at all gave most of
their attention to its formal structure, its style, and especially the
conceit it contained. The model of all lyrical poetry was Petrarch, and
it was in accordance with the lyrical poet's agreement or disagreement
with the Petrarchan method that he was regarded as a success or a
failure. Muzio's critical poem (1551) deals almost entirely with lyrical
verse, and there are discussions on this subject in the works of
Trissino, Equicola, Ruscelli, Scaliger, and Minturno. But the real
question at issue in all these discussions is merely that of external
form, and it is with the question of principles, in so far as they
regard literary criticism, that this essay is primarily concerned. The
theory of dramatic and epic poetry, being fundamental, will therefore
receive almost exclusive attention.
FOOT-NOTES:
[40] Robortelli, p. 1 _sq._
[41] This analysis of Zabarella, _Opera Logica, De Natura Logicae_, ii.
13-23, I owe to the kindness of Professor Butcher of Edinburgh.
Zabarella probably derived his knowledge of Aristotle's _Poetics_ from
Robortelli, under whom he studied Greek. _Cf._ Bayle, _Dict._ s. v.
Zabarella.
[42] Maggi, p. 28 _sq._ _Cf._ B. Tasso, _Lettere_, ii. 514; Scaliger,
_Poet._ i. 2; Castelvetro, _Poetica_, p. 7; Salviati, Cod. Magliabech.
ii. ii. 11, fol. 384 v.; B. Jonson, _Timber_, p. 74.
[43] Daniello, p. 41 _sq._
[44] Robortelli, p. 86 _sq._
[45] Robortelli, p. 90 _sq._
[46] Fracastoro, i. 340.
[47] Fracastoro, i. 357 _sq._
[48] _Poet._ vi. 2.
[49] Varchi, p. 578.
[50] _E.g._ Piccolomini, p. 27 _sq._
[51] Tiraboschi, vii. 1331.
[52] Summo, pp. 61-69.
[53] _Poet._ iii. 95.
[54] _Poet._ i. 1.
[55] Another critic of the time, Vettori, 1560, pp. 14, 93, attacks
poetic prose on the ground that in Aristotle's definition of the various
poetic forms, verse is always spoken of as an essential part. It is
interesting to note that the phrase "poetic prose" is used, perhaps for
the first time, in Minturno, _Arte Poetica_, 1564, p. 3, etc.
[56] _Opere_, x. 254. _Cf._ Minturno, _Arte Poetica_, p. 33.
[57] _Poet._ iii. 96.
[58] Muzio, p. 69.
[59] Giraldi Cintio, i. 61.
[60] _Art Poet._ iii. 50. _Cf._ Horace, _Ars Poet._ 188.
[61] _Zodiac. Vitae_, i. 143.
[62] Butcher, pp. 117, 118.
[63] _Poet._ i. 8.
[64] Fracastoro, i. 335 _sq._
[65] _Cf._ Castelvetro, _Poetica_, p. 27 _sq._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account