[73] LEIST, _Graeco-italische Rechtsgeschichte_, 95, 96. Lack of space prevents any attempt at a detailed discussion of the old Aryan or Indic family and matrimonial law; a general reference must suffice: LEIST, _Alt-arisches Jus Gentium_, 59 ff., 496 ff.; _Graeco-italische Rechtsgeschichte_, 7 ff., 57 ff., _passim_; SCHRADER, _Sprachvergleichung und Urgeschichte_, 379-95; ZIMMER, _Altindisches Leben_, 305-36; JOLLY, _Rechtliche Stellung_, 1 ff.; _idem_, _Hindu Law of Partition_, 70 ff.; KOHLER, "Indisches Ehe- und Familienrecht," _ZVR._, III, 342-442; and his various articles, _ibid._, VI, 344-46 (Indian Archipelago and Caroline Islands); VII, 201-39 (Punjab); VIII, 89-147, 262-73 (Indian customary law); IX, 323-36 (Bengal); X, 66-134 (Bombay); XI, 163-74 (Indian North-west Provinces); BOTSFORD, _Athenian Constitution_, 2-67 (excellent); WAKE, _Marriage and Kinship_, 159 ff., 355 ff., index; BERNHÖFT, "Altindisches Familienorganisation," _ZVR._, IX, 1-45; MCLENNAN, _Patriarchal Theory_, 50 ff., 96 ff., especially the chapters on "sonship among the Hindoos," 266-339, combating the view of MAINE, _Early Law and Custom_, 78-121, 232 ff.; _Early Hist. of Inst._, 116-18, 310 ff.; and MAYNE, _Hindu Law and Usage_, 50 ff., 60 ff., _passim_; STARCKE, _Primitive Family_, 100 ff.; LETOURNEAU, _L'évolution du mariage_, index; HEARN, _Aryan Household_; UNGER, _Die Ehe_, 21-27; BADER, _La femme dans l'Inde antique_, 39 ff.; JACOLLIOT, _La femme dans l'Inde_, 7 ff.