A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 1 of 3 — John Shaqi
A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 1 of 3Howard, George Elliott
History
A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 1 of 3
Howard, George Elliott
Families; Marriage -- History
[90] LEIST, _Graeco-italische Rechtsgeschichte_, 95,
96, also denies (against MARQUARDT, _Privatleben_,
I, 22, 29) that the distinctive feature of the Roman family
is dependent on the patriarchal authority, since the elements
of agnation and paternal power are Aryan. BERNHÖFT,
"Germanische und moderne Rechtsideen im rezipirten röm. Recht,"
_ZVR._, IV, 234, holds that Roman agnation does not depend
upon blood-relationship, but upon power; and this was an Aryan
characteristic; _idem_, _Röm. Königszeit_, 69 ff., 94, 201.
McLennan's hypothesis is plausible, though not strongly supported
by proof. _Cf._ STARCKE, _Primitive Family_, 101;
WAKE, _Marriage and Kinship_, 384, 385.
[91] Such are the isolated facts comprised in the early annals
which seem to imply acknowledged kinship in the female line,
even precedence of the latter; the fact that the status of
slaves, illegitimate children, and the children of concubines
was determined by the condition of the mother; the effects
of marriage by _usus_; the supposed evidences of former
wife-capture and wife-purchase, marking the transition to the
agnatic system; the instances of wife-lending as by the elder
Cato; and especially the plebeian element; for cognation, not
agnation, prevailed among the plebeians, and possibly among
them kinship was at first counted only through the mother;
see DARGUN, _Mutterrecht und Raubehe_, 9-13, 14;
_Mutterrecht und Vaterrecht_, 115; BERNHÖFT, "Zur
Geschichte des europäischen Familienrechts," _ZVR._, VIII,
197-201; "Germanische und moderne Rechtsideen im rezipirten
röm. Recht," _ibid._, IV, 227 ff.; _Staat und Recht der röm.
Königszeit_, 192, 202-7; GIRAUD-TEULON, _Les origines
du mariage_, 408-26; SOHM, _Institutes_, 360, 361,
notes; KARLOWA, _Die Formen der röm. Ehe_, 1 ff.;
MCLENNAN, _Patriarchal Theory_, 194 ff., 205 ff., 259 ff.
[92] "Die Ehe des römischen Civilrechts (justum matrimonium)
war eine formgebundene, durch und durch künstliche
Institution."--DARGUN, _Mutterrecht und Raubehe_, 10.
_Cf._ BERNHÖFT, _Staat und Recht der röm. Königszeit_,
196 ff.
In the meantime, the patriarchal theory has had to reckon with a
totally different view of the genesis and development of social
institutions. To this view let us now turn.
CHAPTER II
THEORY OF THE HORDE AND MOTHER-RIGHT
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account