A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 2 of 3Howard, George Elliott
History
A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 2 of 3
Howard, George Elliott
Families; Marriage -- History
Primary sources for the settlement of the canon law on the
subject of divorce are the _Decretum_ of Gratian and the other
materials comprised in Richter-Friedberg's _Corpus juris
canonici_. For England Johnson's _Canons_ and Godolphin's
_Repartorium canonicum_ (3d ed., London, 1687) are serviceable.
The state of the law in the age of the decretalists may
be learned from Wunderlich's edition of Tancred's _Summa
de matrimonio_ (Göttingen, 1841); and for its historical
development the great works of Esmein and Freisen, elsewhere
mentioned, are indispensable. Schulte's _Lehrbuch_ and the
_Lehrbuch_ of Friedberg cover the subject. In connection with
the rise of the jurisdiction of the church should be read Sohm,
"Die geist. Gerichtsbarkeit im frank. Reich," in _ZKR._, IX
(Tübingen, 1870). For the matrimonial experiences of Margaret
of Scotland, illustrating the facility of divorce by indirect
methods under the canon law, see Tait's article in the _Dict. of
Nat. Biog._, XXXVI; and similar material in the _Reports of the
Historical Manuscripts Commission_. For the literature relating
to the Council of Trent consult Bibliographical Note VII.
The foundation of the Protestant doctrine of divorce was laid by
Martin Luther. His writings on the subject may, of course, be
found in his collected works mentioned in Bibliographical Note
IX; or in the source-book of Strampff, _Luther: Ueber die Ehe_
(Berlin, 1857); while the more important papers are reprinted
in Vol. II of the _Kleinere Schriften Dr. Martin Luthers: von
Ehe- und Klostersachen_ (Bielefeld and Leipzig, 1877). An
earlier book of a somewhat similar character is Froböse's _Dr.
Martin Luther's ernste, kräftige Worte über Ehe und eheliche
Verhältnisse_ (Hanover, 1825). In the sixteenth century Luther's
relatively conservative teaching regarding the scriptural
grounds of divorce is adopted in the main by the theologians
Brenz, _Wie yn Ehesachen ... zu Handeln_ (1530); Bugenhagen,
_Von Ehebruch und Weglaufen_ (1539); also in the collections
of Sarcerius, below mentioned; Chemnitz, _Examen concilii
tridentini_ (Frankfort, 1615); Beza, _Tractatio de repudiis et
divortiis_ (Geneva, 1569); the jurists Kling, _Matrimonialium
causarum tractatus_ (1st ed., Frankfort, 1553; 3d ed., here
cited, 1577), being a reprint of the title "De nuptiis" of his
_Enarrationes in Institutiones_ (1542); Beust, _Tractatus de
jure connubiorum_ (3d ed., Leipzig, 1592); _idem_, _Tractatus
de sponsalibus et matrimoniis_ (Wittenberg, 1586); Schneidewin,
_Commentarius in Institutiones_ (1st ed., Wittenberg, 1571); and
_idem_, _De nuptiis_ (Jena, 1585), being a part of the earlier
work published by the heirs after the author's death. In the
seventeenth century the more stringent tendency is represented
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account