A history of the Peninsular War, Vol. 6, September 1, 1812-August 5, 1813 : $b The siege of Burgos, the retreat from Burgos, the campaign of Vittoria, the battles of the Pyrenees — John Shaqi
A history of the Peninsular War, Vol. 6, September 1, 1812-August 5, 1813 : $b The siege of Burgos, the retreat from Burgos, the campaign of Vittoria, the battles of the PyreneesOman, Charles
History
A history of the Peninsular War, Vol. 6, September 1, 1812-August 5, 1813 : $b The siege of Burgos, the retreat from Burgos, the campaign of Vittoria, the battles of the Pyrenees
Oman, Charles
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
The garrison of Burgos belonged to the Army of the North, not to that
of Portugal. Caffarelli himself paid a hasty visit to the place just
before the siege began, and threw in some picked troops--two battalions
of the 34th[28], one of the 130th; making 1,600 infantry. There were
also a company of artillery, another of pioneers, and detachments
which brought up the whole to exactly 2,000 men--a very sufficient
number for a place of such small size. There were nine heavy guns (16-
and 12-pounders), of which eight were placed in the Napoleon battery,
eleven field-pieces (seven of them in San Miguel), and six mortars or
howitzers. This was none too great a provision, and would have been
inadequate against a besieger provided with a proper battering-train:
Wellington--as we shall see--was not so provided. The governor was a
General of Brigade named Dubreton, one of the most resourceful and
enterprising officers whom the British army ever encountered. He earned
at Burgos a reputation even more brilliant than that which Phillipon
acquired at Badajoz.
The weak points of the fortress were firstly the unfinished condition
of the San Miguel hornwork, which Dubreton had to maintain as long as
he could, in order that the British might not use the hill on which it
stood as vantage ground for battering the Castle; secondly, the lack
of cover within the works. The Donjon and the church of Santa Maria
could not house a tithe of the garrison; the rest had to bivouac in
the open, a trying experience in the rain, which fell copiously on
many days of the siege. If the besiegers had possessed a provision
of mortars, to keep up a regular bombardment of the interior of the
Castle, it would not long have been tenable, owing to the losses that
must have been suffered. Thirdly must be mentioned the bad construction
of many of the works--part of them were mediaeval structures, not
originally intended to resist cannon, and hastily adapted to modern
necessities: some of them were not furnished with parapets or
embrasures--which had to be extemporized with sandbags. Lastly, it must
be remembered that the conical shape of the hill exposed the inner no
less than the outer works to battering: the lower _enceintes_ only
partly covered the inner ones, whose higher sections stood up visible
above them. The Donjon and Santa Maria were exposed from the first to
such fire as the enemy could turn against them, no less than the walls
of the outer circumference. If Wellington had owned the siege-train
that he brought against Badajoz, the place must have succumbed in ten
days. But the commander was able and determined, the troops willing,
the supply of food and of artillery munitions ample--Burgos had
always been an important dépôt. Dubreton’s orders were to keep his
enemy detained as long as possible--and he succeeded, even beyond all
reasonable expectations.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account