A history of the Peninsular War, Vol. 6, September 1, 1812-August 5, 1813 : $b The siege of Burgos, the retreat from Burgos, the campaign of Vittoria, the battles of the Pyrenees — John Shaqi
A history of the Peninsular War, Vol. 6, September 1, 1812-August 5, 1813 : $b The siege of Burgos, the retreat from Burgos, the campaign of Vittoria, the battles of the PyreneesOman, Charles
History
A history of the Peninsular War, Vol. 6, September 1, 1812-August 5, 1813 : $b The siege of Burgos, the retreat from Burgos, the campaign of Vittoria, the battles of the Pyrenees
Oman, Charles
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
subordinates, and it is inexplicable that he did not in place of them
bring up from Madrid real battering-guns: with ten more 18-pounders
he would undoubtedly have taken the Castle of Burgos. But heavy guns
require many draught cattle, and are hard to drag over bad roads: the
absolute minimum had been taken with the army, as in June. And it was
impossible to bring up more siege-guns in a hurry, as was done at the
siege of the Salamanca forts, for the nearest available pieces were
not a mere sixty miles away, as on the former occasion, but double and
triple that distance. Yet if, on the first day of doubt before Burgos,
Wellington had sent urgent orders for the dispatch of more 18-pounders
from Madrid, they would have been up in time; though no doubt there
would have been terrible difficulties in providing for their transport.
It was only when it had grown too late that more artillery was at last
requisitioned--and had to be turned back not long after it had started.
Other defects there were in the besieging army, especially the same
want of trained sappers and miners that had been seen at Badajoz,
and of engineer officers[33]. Of this more hereafter:--the first
and foremost difficulty, without which the rest would have been
comparatively unimportant, was the lack of heavy artillery.
But to proceed to the chronicle of the siege. On the evening on which
the army arrived before Burgos the 6th Division took post on the south
bank of the Arlanzon: the 1st Division and Pack’s Portuguese brigade
swept round the city and formed an investing line about the Castle.
It was drawn as close as possible, especially on the side of the
hornwork of San Miguel, where the light companies of the first Division
pushed up the hill, taking shelter in dead ground where they could,
and dislodged the French outposts from the three _flèches_ which lay
upon its sky-line. Wellington, after consulting his chief engineer
and artillery officers, determined that his first move must be to
capture the hornwork, in order to use its vantage-ground for battering
the Castle. The same night (September 19-20) an assault, without any
preparation of artillery fire, was made upon it. The main body of the
assailing force was composed of Pack’s Portuguese, who were assisted
by the whole of the 1/42nd and by the flank-companies[34] of Stirling’s
brigade of the 1st Division, to which the Black Watch belonged. The
arrangement was that while a strong firing party (300 men) of the
1/42nd were to advance to the neighbourhood of the horn work, ‘as near
to the salient angle as possible,’ and to endeavour to keep down the
fire of the garrison, two columns each composed of Portuguese, but with
ladder parties and forlorn hopes from the Highland battalion, should
charge at the two demi-bastions to right and left of the salient, and
escalade them. Meanwhile the flank-companies of Stirling’s brigade
(1/42nd, 1/24th, 1/79th) were to make a false attack upon the rear, or
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account