A history of the Peninsular War, Vol. 6, September 1, 1812-August 5, 1813 : $b The siege of Burgos, the retreat from Burgos, the campaign of Vittoria, the battles of the Pyrenees — John Shaqi
A history of the Peninsular War, Vol. 6, September 1, 1812-August 5, 1813 : $b The siege of Burgos, the retreat from Burgos, the campaign of Vittoria, the battles of the PyreneesOman, Charles
History
A history of the Peninsular War, Vol. 6, September 1, 1812-August 5, 1813 : $b The siege of Burgos, the retreat from Burgos, the campaign of Vittoria, the battles of the Pyrenees
Oman, Charles
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
This work, having to be cut very deep, as it was to go right under
the ditch, and being in the hands of untrained volunteers from the
infantry, who had no proper cutting tools, advanced very slowly. The
soil, fortunately, was favourable, being a stiff argillaceous clay
which showed no disposition to crumble up: the gallery was cut as if
in stone, with even and perpendicular sides and floor, and no props
or timbering were found necessary. The main hindrance to rapid work,
over and above the unskilfulness of the miners, was the foul air which
accumulated at the farther end of the excavation: many times it was
necessary to withdraw the men for some hours to allow it to clear away.
At noon on September 29 the miners declared that they had reached the
foundations of the wall, and this seemed correct enough, for they had
come to a course of large rough blocks of stone, extending laterally
for as far as could be probed. It is probable, however, that the
masonry was really the remains of some old advanced turret or outwork,
projecting in front of the modern _enceinte_. For when the end of the
mine was packed with twelve barrels, containing 90 lb. of powder each,
well tamped, and fired at midnight, the explosion brought down many
stones from the front of the wall, but did not affect the earth of the
rampart, which remained standing perpendicular behind it. There seemed,
however, to be places, at the points where the broken facing joined
the intact part of the wall, where men might scramble up. Accordingly
the storming-column of 300 volunteers who had been waiting for the
explosion, was let loose, under cover of a strong musketry fire from
the trenches. A sergeant and four men went straight for one of the
accessible points, mounted, and were cast down again, three of them
wounded. But the main body of the forlorn hope and its officer went
a little farther along the wall, reached a section that was wholly
impracticable for climbing, and ran back to the trenches to report that
the defences were uninjured. The supports followed their example. The
loss, therefore, was small--only 29 killed and wounded--but the moral
effect of the repulse was very bad. The men, for the most part, made
up their minds that they had been sent to a hopeless and impossible
task by the errors of an incompetent staff. The engineers declared that
the stormers had not done their best, or made any serious attempt to
approach the wall.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account