A history of the Peninsular War, Vol. 6, September 1, 1812-August 5, 1813 : $b The siege of Burgos, the retreat from Burgos, the campaign of Vittoria, the battles of the Pyrenees — John Shaqi
A history of the Peninsular War, Vol. 6, September 1, 1812-August 5, 1813 : $b The siege of Burgos, the retreat from Burgos, the campaign of Vittoria, the battles of the PyreneesOman, Charles
History
A history of the Peninsular War, Vol. 6, September 1, 1812-August 5, 1813 : $b The siege of Burgos, the retreat from Burgos, the campaign of Vittoria, the battles of the Pyrenees
Oman, Charles
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
The idea of requisitioning ship guns had been started on the very first
day of the siege (September 20) by Sir Howard Douglas, who had lately
come from Popham’s side, and maintained that by the use of draught
oxen, supplemented by man-handling in difficult places, the thing could
be done. But Wellington would hear nothing of it, maintaining that
matters would be settled one way or another before the guns could
possibly arrive. After the disaster to batteries 3 and 4 on October 2nd
he--too late--altered his opinion, and consented that an appeal should
be made to Popham. The Commodore rose to the occasion, and started off
two 24-pounders on October 9th, which by immense exertions were dragged
as far as Reynosa, only 50 miles from Burgos, by October 18th, and had
passed the worst part of the road. But at Reynosa they were turned
back, for Wellington was just raising the siege and preparing to retire
on Valladolid. It is clear that if they had been asked for on September
20 instead of October 3rd--as Howard Douglas had suggested--they and
no doubt another heavy gun or so, could have been brought forward
in time for the last bombardment, and might have turned it into a
success. But guns might also have come from Madrid: Wellington did not
think it wholly impossible to move artillery from the Retiro arsenal.
For, ere he left it on August 31, he had instructed Carlos de España
that the best guns there should be evacuated on to Ciudad Rodrigo,
if ever Soult and King Joseph should draw too close in[47]. It is
true that he observed that the transport would be a difficult matter,
and that much would have to be destroyed, and not carried off. But
it is clear that he thought that _some_ cannon could be moved. The
strangest part of the story is that his own brother-in-law, Pakenham,
wrote to him from Madrid offering to send him twelve heavy guns over
the Somosierra, pledging himself to manage the transport by means
of oxen got in the Madrid district. His offer was rejected[48]. It
seems that the conviction that the Castle of Burgos would be a hard
nut to crack came too late to Wellington. And when he did realize its
strength, he did not reconsider the matter of siege artillery at once,
but proceeded to try the methods of Badajoz and Almaraz, mere _force
majeure_ applied by escalade, instead of thinking of bringing up more
guns. He judged--wrongly as it chanced--that he would either take
the place by sheer assault, or else that the French field army would
interfere before October was far advanced. Neither hypothesis turned
out correct, and so he had the opportunity of a full month’s siege, and
failed in it for want of means that might have been procured, if only
he had made another resolve on August 31st, or even on September 20.
But even the greatest generals cannot be infallible prophets concerning
what they will require a month ahead. The mistake is explicable,
and the critic who censures it over-much would be presumptuous and
unreasonable[49].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account