A History, of the War of 1812-15 Between the United States and Great BritainJohnson, Rossiter
History
A History, of the War of 1812-15 Between the United States and Great Britain
Johnson, Rossiter
United States -- History -- War of 1812
England was at this time the greatest commercial nation in the world.
Her merchant ships and whalers were found on every sea, gathering and
distributing the productions of every land. In herself she was but an
island, not larger than one of our States--a very beautiful and fertile
island, it is true; but if her jurisdiction had not extended beyond its
borders, she would have been hardly more important than Switzerland or
Sweden. But in her colonies and her commerce she was powerful. And now
the finest of those colonies, casting off her authority in the only
successful rebellion ever waged against it, were rapidly building up
a mercantile marine {005}that threatened to rival her own. They had
thousands of miles of seacoast, with innumerable fine harbors; they
had behind them, not a crowded island, but a virgin continent; the
construction of their government and society was such that the poorest
man before the mast might not unreasonably hope some day to command a
ship. With all this, they were not involved in the wars which were then
distracting Europe.
Being neutrals, of course they enjoyed those advantages which England
has never been slow to reap when she herself has been a neutral while
her neighbors were at war. Their ships could carry goods which in any
other ships would have been seized by hostile cruisers. England was
now--as she truly said, in extenuation of her depredation on American
commerce--struggling for her very existence, against mighty armies led
by the ablest general that had appeared since Alexander. Many of the
most desirable ports were closed to her merchantmen, her entire coast
was declared by Napoleon to be under blockade; and it was exasperating
in the last degree to see these misfortunes redounding to the advantage
of a people whom she had so lately treated as rebels and outlaws, whose
military prowess she had affected to despise, until it had disarmed
her legions and conquered an honorable peace. {006}The motive that
controlled British policy was plainly revealed in an editorial article
which appeared in the London _Independent Whig_ (January 10th, 1813),
after the war had been begun and the British public had been astounded
by the capture of two or three of their finest frigates. "Accustomed, as
we have hitherto been, to a long and uninterrupted tide of success upon
the watery element, and claiming an absolute and exclusive sovereignty
over the ocean, to be defeated there, where we securely rested our
proudest hopes and wishes, might reasonably be expected to check our
insolence and mortify our pride. In this view of the case, and if we
could not flatter ourselves that it would have the effect of inducing us
to abate somewhat of our unwarrantable pretensions, and listen to terms
of moderation and forbearance, our regret would be sensibly diminished;
since even the misfortune, severe as it is, might be converted into a
great and lasting benefit to the nation at large. But the mischief will
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account