England -- Description and travel; Wales -- Description and travel
As I left the village by a road that bent round sharply by the side of
a park, at last I saw a human being, a man close at hand in a field. So
I pulled up and asked where the church was, or if there were one. "The
church," replied he, "it be away in the park opposite, right in the
woods. You cannot see it till you come to it. You go in at the lodge
gate and follow the road over the bridge, then when you comes in sight
of the house you turns to the right, and there be the church in the
woods. It be a curious old place, over a thousand years old they do
say." I thought I would see it. A thousand years old is a fair age for
a building, and though the man might be mistaken in that, probably the
building was very ancient. So off I set in search of the church that
I found some way off in the park, half hidden and surrounded by trees
and green in the shade of them. A humble little church with a damp and
time-worn look, yet with a certain pathetic charm about it that belongs
to most things ancient of man's contriving. I was surprised in so poor
a church to come upon a fine altar-tomb with the recumbent effigies of
a man and his two wives, and the kneeling figures of their children
below; and another similar monument, both to members of the same Neale
family, the earliest one bearing date of 1599. Drops of moisture were
dripping down the sides of the monuments as though the very stones
were mourning for the forgotten dead. There is some fine carved oak in
the church going to decay, and a curious old pillared font. But the
interior was so dim and damp I was glad to get out of it. It certainly
is an ancient church, and perhaps looks more ancient than it really
is. Some of the walls, and certainly the small yet massive tower, are
Norman, but that would not make it over a thousand years old; still, a
century or two is nothing to rural folk. I once asked a man in a little
country town if he could tell me the age of an interesting old house
there. "I don't rightly know just how old it be," he replied, "but it's
over a million years old, that I know for certain." I was astonished.
"Surely you have made a mistake?" I exclaimed. "No, I haven't," he
responded, "for there's the date carved upon it, as you may see," and
he pointed this out to me, for it had escaped my notice, carved in
Roman letters, "MDXCII." "There, I told you it was over a million years
old. 'M' stands for a million, as you know, and the other letters for
more years, but I cannot rightly read them." I said nothing; it was not
my business to educate the countryman. Once I did attempt to correct a
villager about some glaring mistake in reading an inscription--he would
read it to me; he resented my correction and walked off in a huff; now
I am careful not to run the risk of so offending again.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account