A Letter to the Viscount Palmerston, M.P. &c. &c. &c. on the Monitorial System of Harrow SchoolVaughan, C. J. (Charles John)
History
A Letter to the Viscount Palmerston, M.P. &c. &c. &c. on the Monitorial System of Harrow School
Vaughan, C. J. (Charles John)
Harrow School; Monitorial system of education
You may adopt what might with equal propriety be called the foreign
School, or the Private School, system. You may create a body of Ushers;
Masters of a lower order, whose business it shall be to follow Boys into
their hours of recreation and rest, avowedly as spies, coercing freedom
of speech and action, or reporting to their superior what such
observation has gleaned. This is consistent and intelligible. Ruinous
to that which has been regarded as the great glory of an English Public
School—its free developement of character, its social expansiveness, in
short its _liberty_: but yet, in itself, intelligible enough, and in
theory perhaps preferable to the other.
If not this, then the alternative must be some form or other of the
Monitorial principle. Ten, or twenty, or thirty, of those Boys who are
(generally speaking) the elder, at all events the abler, the more
diligent, the more meritorious,—selected by no favour, exempted from none
of the rules and restraints of School, but yet brought by their position
into a more intimate intercourse with their Master, and largely
influenced (if he be what a Master ought to be) by his principles of
judgment and discipline,—are empowered to exercise over their juniors a
legalized and carefully regulated authority, while at the same time they
are left to mix with them on terms of perfect freedom at times and in
places to which no Master’s inspection could by possibility extend.
But this system is capable of at least two modifications.
The Monitors may be desired to act as the Master’s deputies; to observe
for him, and to report to him. They may be charged to see nothing wrong
done, to hear nothing wrong said, without hastening to his presence and
invoking his interposition. They may be taught to regard themselves as
the Master’s spies, informers, and creatures. Such has been made,
sometimes, the theory of their office. They have been solemnly warned of
the responsibility attaching to their office, as the Master’s eyes and
the Master’s ears. No real _power_ was entrusted to them. The terms of
their commission were large, its tone was solemn: but the power to
enforce obedience either did not exist, or existed only on sufferance and
by stealth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account