A marvelous history of Mary of Nimmegen: Who for more than seven year lived and had ado with the devil
History
A marvelous history of Mary of Nimmegen: Who for more than seven year lived and had ado with the devil
Dutch literature -- To 1500 -- Translations into English; Mystery and miracle plays
_How, then, must we account for its intrusion if the prose did not
originally form part of the play? The manner in which the drama has been
preserved accounts for it. “Mary of Nimmegen” has not come down to us in
manuscript form. The earliest known version is a printed chapbook from
the press of Willem Vorsterman of Antwerp, who was admitted as a member
of St. Luke’s Guild in 1512, and remained at work in that city until
1543. The volume is not dated but probably came from the press in 1518
or 1519. Printed plays were a novelty at that early date. Vorsterman
may have felt that to publish a drama in book form needed some
justification. The word that was intended to be spoken could not be made
to serve the reader’s purpose without a compromise between the dramatic
and the epic. For the book is the story-teller’s domain, and the dialogue
was not felt to be a story until the narrator’s “quoth he” subordinated
every speech to his control. That seems to be the purpose of the inserted
prose sections. They were not written, in the first instance, to
elucidate situations left indistinct by the dramatist, but to lend to the
drama the semblance of a narrative and thereby justify its appearance in
print. Willem Vorsterman was careful not to offer his book to the public
as a play: “A very marvelous story of Mary of Nimmegen who for more than
seven years lived and had ado with the devil”, is his description of
the contents of the volume on its title-page. And the three subsequent
editions, that of 1608 by Herman van Borculo, of Utrecht, that of 1615
by Pauwels Stroobant, of Antwerp, and a reprint of the latter probably
published in Holland, though falsely bearing the imprint of Stroobant on
the title-page, all persist in calling the book a “story”, be it a “very
marvelous” according to Vorsterman, or a “beautiful and very marvelous
and true” according to Van Borculo and Stroobant. The printers knew
too well that the play’s dramatic qualities would not secure its ready
sale. The moral tale it embodied, not its literary form, was its chief
attraction, and as a “story” it made its appeal to the reading public._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account