A Philosophical Essay on ProbabilitiesLaplace, Pierre Simon, marquis de
Philosophy
A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities
Laplace, Pierre Simon, marquis de
Probabilities
increases by a twentieth the probability of the simple event which it
favors. If this event is heads, its probability will be ½ plus 1/20, or
11/20, and the probability of throwing it twice in succession will be
the square of 11/20, or 121/400. If the favored event is tails, the
probability of heads, will be ½ minus 1/20, or 9/20, and the probability
of throwing it twice in succession will be 81/400. Since we have at
first no reason for believing that the inequality favors one of these
events rather than the other, it is clear that in order to have the
probability of the compound event heads heads it is necessary to add the
two preceding probabilities and take the half of their sum, which gives
101/400 for this probability, which exceeds ¼ by 1/400 or by the square
of the favor 1/20 that the inequality adds to the possibilities of the
event which it favors. The probability of throwing tails tails is
similarly 101/400, but the probability of throwing heads tails or tails
heads is each 99/400; for the sum of these four probabilities ought to
equal certainty or unity. We find thus generally that the constant and
unknown causes which favor simple events which are judged equally
possible always increase the probability of the repetition of the same
simple event.
In an even number of throws heads and tails ought both to happen either
an even number of times or odd number of times. The probability of each
of these cases is ½ if the possibilities of the two faces are equal; but
if there is between them an unknown inequality, this inequality is
always favorable to the first case.
Two players whose skill is supposed to be equal play on the conditions
that at each throw that one who loses gives a counter to his adversary,
and that the game continues until one of the players has no more
counters. The calculation of the probabilities shows us that for the
equality of the play the throws of the players ought to be an inverse
ratio to their counters. But if there is between the players a small
unknown inequality, it favors that one of the players who has the
smallest number of counters. His probability of winning the game
increases if the players agree to double or triple their counters; and
it will be ½ or the same as the probability of the other player in the
case where the number of their counters should become infinite,
preserving always the same ratio.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account