A Possible Solution of the Number Series on Pages 51 to 58 of the Dresden Codex — John Shaqi
A Possible Solution of the Number Series on Pages 51 to 58 of the Dresden CodexGuthe, Carl E. (Carl Eugen)
Science
A Possible Solution of the Number Series on Pages 51 to 58 of the Dresden Codex
Guthe, Carl E. (Carl Eugen)
Codex Dresdensis Maya
[1] For those unacquainted with Maya arithmetic the following points
will explain matters: the Mayas used the vigesimal system of
enumeration; they counted by twenties instead of tens. A bar
represented five, and a dot stood for one. They represented
numbers larger than twenty by position, just as we do. However,
instead of having the smallest denomination at the right and the
largest at the left of a horizontal series of figures, they had
the smallest at the bottom and the largest at the top of a column
of numbers. Instead of each unit in a given position representing
ten times the value of that of the preceding position, it
represented twenty times the value, except in the third position
where it was only eighteen times as great. Thus each unit of the
bottom number represented one (Kin), that of the number above it
twenty (Uinal), that of the third number 20 × 18 or 360 (Tun),
that of the fourth position 20 × 360 or 7200 (Katun), etc. For
ease in handling, these numbers are written in our script with
arabic numerals, the bottom number on the right, and separated by
periods. Thus in column three, page 53a, the upper number is
1. 7. 2, which means that the kin of this group is 2, the Uinal 7,
(7 × 20) and the Tun 1 (1 × 360), making in all 2 + 140 + 360 or
502.
The Maya calendar, like ours, consisted of a series of numbers and
a series of names for each day, each series repeating itself
constantly, irrespective of the other. There were twenty different
day names, which remained in an unchangeable order, and thirteen
numbers. In the pages under discussion these day names appear as
glyphs preceded by the necessary number.
For further details consult S. G. Morley, _An Introduction to
Maya Hieroglyphs_, Bulletin 57, Bureau of American Ethnology,
Washington, D. C., 1915, and C. P. Bowditch, 1910.
In short, then, the ideal arrangement of the series is as follows: Each
upper number is the sum of all the lower numbers of the preceding
columns and its own column. Each lower number expresses the difference
between the upper number of its own column and that of the column
immediately preceding it. The day names and numbers are three horizontal
series, each starting a day later than the one above it, and recording
three sets of day names and numbers which would fit the series formed by
the upper numbers. It should be noticed that the mathematical
interpretation of the series does not appear to depend in any way upon
the hieroglyphs appearing at the top of the columns, or upon the
pictures.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account