He had not been long at Taneytown before he and his church-trustees
fell out,--a thing at that time so common that it would not be worth
mentioning, says his biographer, had it not been the occasion of
making Gallitzin first think of founding an independent colony
established on entirely Catholic lines.
In the year 1798 Bishop Carroll wrote to inform him that some of his
flock had been complaining of his harshness and high-handedness. The
good Bishop knew how to take such an accusation with a very large
grain of salt; still he thought it well to remind his ardent
missionary to temper zeal for God's glory with gentleness and
forbearance toward his neighbor. The advice was given in the most
paternal spirit; and it may well have been that Gallitzin, with the
blood of many a Russian despot in his veins, should sometimes have
found it difficult to accommodate himself to the ways of American
democracy. But he was singularly clear-headed as well as far-seeing;
and not many years were needed to prove to the rising episcopate that
he had been contending for something worth a contest--the freedom and
independence of action of the clergy, without which a priest's
position in regard to his flock becomes false and untenable. The
trustee system, which answers among the various Protestant sects,
does not work well in a Catholic parish. The priest's position is
that of the spiritual father of a family, not that of a salaried
preacher to a congregation of critics.
It may here be objected that trustees were useful in the erection of
churches, founding of missions, etc. Even in such cases it is not
clear that the system worked well. In a new country, where
speculation was the order of the day, sharp practice might be
resorted to in the building of a church or school as unscrupulously
as in that of a theatre or factory. Sacred buildings would be
erected with borrowed money, which might be reclaimed by an
unfortunate speculator at a moment when it was impossible to pay back
the loan; and thus a church might come under the hammer, without any
regard to its holy character.
Pews--of the old-fashioned kind, provided with lock and key--filled
the churches, and were let to the highest bidders by auction. To
Gallitzin, such a system, which left the poor no alternative but to
be jostled in the doorway or to stop at home, was an abomination. He
also strongly resented trial sermons, such as are usual among
Presbyterians, where the congregations are free to choose whichever
candidate has pleased them best by his discourse. Gallitzin could
not and would not be a parish priest under such conditions. It was
not for this that he had left home and country and fortune and honors.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account