A Selection from the Discourses of Epictetus with the EncheiridionEpictetus
Philosophy
A Selection from the Discourses of Epictetus with the Encheiridion
Epictetus
Philosophy -- Early works to 1800
The condition and characteristic of an uninstructed person is this: he
never expects from himself profit (advantage) nor harm, but from
externals. The condition and characteristic of a philosopher is this:
he expects all advantage and all harm from himself. The signs (marks)
of one who is making progress are these: he censures no man, he praises
no man, he blames no man, he accuses no man, he says nothing about
himself as if he were somebody or knew something; when he is impeded at
all or hindered, he blames himself; if a man praises him he ridicules
the praiser to himself; if a man censures him he makes no defence; he
goes about like weak persons, being careful not to move any of the
things which are placed, before they are firmly fixed; he removes all
desire from himself, and he transfers aversion ([Greek: echchlisin]) to
those things only of the things within our power which are contrary to
nature; he employs a moderate movement towards everything; whether he
is considered foolish or ignorant he cares not; and in a word he
watches himself as if he were an enemy and lying in ambush.
XLIX.
When a man is proud because he can understand and explain the writings
of Chrysippus, say to yourself, If Chrysippus had not written
obscurely, this man would have had nothing to be proud of. But what is
it that I wish? To understand nature and to follow it. I inquire
therefore who is the interpreter? and when I have heard that it is
Chrysippus, I come to him (the interpreter). But I do not understand
what is written, and therefore I seek the interpreter. And so far there
is yet nothing to be proud of. But when I shall have found the
interpreter, the thing that remains is to use the precepts (the
lessons). This itself is the only thing to be proud of. But if I shall
admire the exposition, what else have I been made unless a grammarian
instead of a philosopher? except in one thing, that I am explaining
Chrysippus instead of Homer. When, then, any man says to me, Read
Chrysippus to me, I rather blush, when I cannot show my acts like to
and consistent with his words.
L.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account