A Short View of the Immorality, and Profaneness of the English Stage: Together with the Sense of Antiquity on this Argument — John Shaqi
A Short View of the Immorality, and Profaneness of the English Stage: Together with the Sense of Antiquity on this ArgumentCollier, Jeremy
General
A Short View of the Immorality, and Profaneness of the English Stage: Together with the Sense of Antiquity on this Argument
Collier, Jeremy
Theater -- England -- Early works to 1800; Theater -- Moral and ethical aspects -- Early works to 1800
And if Religion signifies nothing, (as I am afraid it does with some
People) there is Law, as well as Gospel against _Swearing_. _3d Jac. 1
cap. 21._ is expresly against the _Playhouse_. It runs thus.
For the preventing and avoiding of the great abuse of the holy Name of
God, in Stage Plays, Enterludes &c. Be it enacted by our Sovereign Lord
&c. That if at any time, or times, after the End of this present Session
of Parliament; any Person or Persons do, or shall in any Stage Play,
Enterlude, Show, &c. Jeastingly or Profanly, speak or use the Holy Name
of God, or of Christ Jesus, or of the Holy Ghost, or of the Trinity,
which are not to be spoken, but with Fear and Reverence; shall forfeit
for every such offence, by him or them committed, ten pounds: The one
Moity thereof to the King's Majesty, his Heirs; and Successors, the other
Moity thereof to him, or them, that will sue for the same in any Court of
Record at Westminster, wherein no essoin, protection, or wager of Law
shall be allow'd.
By this _Act_ not only direct Swearing, but all vain Invocation of the Name
of God is forbidden. This _Statute_ well executed would mend the _Poets_,
or sweep the _Box_: And the _Stage_ must either reform, or not thrive upon
Profaness.
_3dly_ Swearing in the _Playhouse_ is an ungentlemanly, as well as an
unchristian Practice. The _Ladies_ make a considerable part of the
_Audience_. Now Swearing before Women is reckon'd a Breach of good
Behaviour, and therefore a civil Atheist will forbear it. The custom seems
to go upon this Presumption; that the Impressions of Religion are strongest
in Women, and more generally spread. And that it must be very disagreeable
to them, to hear the Majesty of God treated with so little respect.
Besides: Oaths are a boistrous and tempestuous sort of Conversation;
Generally the effects of Passion, and spoken with Noise, and Heat. Swearing
looks like the beginning of a Quarrel, to which Women have an aversion: As
being neither armed by Nature, nor disciplin'd by Custome for such rough
Disputes. A Woman will start at a Soldiers Oath, almost as much as at the
Report of his Pistol: And therefore a well Bred Man will no more Swear,
than Fight in the Company of Ladies.
A _Second_ Branch of the Profaness of the _Stage_ is their Abuse of
Religion, and _Holy Scripture_. And here sometimes they don't stop short of
Blasphemy. To cite all that might be Collected of this kind would be
tedious. I shall give the _Reader_ enough to justifie the Charge, and I
hope to abhor the Practice.
To begin with the _Mock-Astrologer_. In the First _Act_ the _Scene_ is a
_Chappel_; And that the Use of such Consecrated places may be the better
understood, the time is taken up in Courtship, Raillery, and ridiculing
Devotion. _Jacinta_ takes her turn among the rest. She Interrupts
_Theodosia_, and cries out: _why Sister, Sister----will you pray? what
injury have I ever done you that you should pray in my Company?_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account