SECT. III. _Remarks on the_ Relapse. p. 209 _A Misnommer in the Title of the_ Play. p. 210 _The_ Moral _Vitious_. p. 211 _The_ Plot _ill Contriv'd_. p. 212 _The_ Manners _or_ Characters _out of Order_. p. 218 _The three_ Dramatick Unities _broken_. p. 228 CHAP. VI. _The Opinion of the_ Heathen _Philosophers_, _Orators_, _and Historians_, _concerning the_ Stage. p. 233 _The_ Stage _censured by the_ State. _This proved from the_ Constitutions _of_ Athens, Sparta, _and_ Rome. p. 240 _Farther Instances of this publick Discountentance in the_ Theodosian Code. p. 241 _In our own_ Statute Book. p. 242 _And in the late Order of the_ French King. p. 243 _An_ Order _of the Bishop of_ Arras _against_ Plays. p. 245 _The_ Stage _Condemn'd by the_ Primitive Church. p. 250 _The_ Councils _of_ Illiberis, Arles, &c. _cited_. Ibid. _The Testimony's of the_ Fathers _against the_ Stage, _particularly, of_ Theophilus Antiochenus. p. 252 _Of_ Tertullian. p. 253 _Of_ Clemens Alexandrinus. p. 260 _Of_ Minutius Foelix. p. 261 _Of St._ Cyprian. Ibid. Lactantius. p. 265 _St._ Chrisostom. p. 267 _St._ Hierom. p. 272 _And St._ Augustine _cited to the same purpose_. p. 273 _The Censure of the_ Fathers, _and_ Councils _&c. applicable to the_ English Stage. p. 276 _The Conclusion._ p. 280 _ERRATA._