A Sixth-Century Fragment of the Letters of Pliny the Younger: A Study of Six Leaves of an Uncial Manuscript Preserved; in the Pierpont Morgan Library New York — John Shaqi
A Sixth-Century Fragment of the Letters of Pliny the Younger: A Study of Six Leaves of an Uncial Manuscript Preserved; in the Pierpont Morgan Library New YorkRand, Edward Kennard
General
A Sixth-Century Fragment of the Letters of Pliny the Younger: A Study of Six Leaves of an Uncial Manuscript Preserved; in the Pierpont Morgan Library New York
Rand, Edward Kennard
Manuscripts, Latin -- Facsimiles; Manuzio, Aldo, 1449 or 50-1515; Paleography, Latin; Pliny, the Younger -- Correspondence
So it is France that has saved this, the oldest extant witness of
Pliny’s _Letters_, for modern times. To mediaeval France we are, in
fact, indebted for the preservation of more than one ancient classical
manuscript. The oldest manuscript of the third decade of Livy was at
Corbie in Charlemagne’s time, when it was loaned to Tours and a copy of
it made there. Both copy and original have come down to us. Sallust’s
_Histories_ were saved (though not in complete form) for our generation
by the Abbey of Fleury. The famous Schedae Vergilianae, in square
capitals, as well as the Codex Romanus of Virgil, in rustic capitals,
belonged to the monastery of St. Denis. Lyons preserved the _Codex
Theodosianus_. It was again some French centre that rescued Pomponius
Mela from destruction. The oldest fragments of Ovid’s _Pontica_, the
oldest fragments of the first decade of Livy, the oldest manuscript of
Pliny’s _Natural History_--all palimpsests--were in some French centre
in the Middle Ages, as may be seen from the indisputably eighth-century
French writing which covers the ancient texts. The student of Latin
literature knows that the manuscript tradition of Lucretius, Suetonius,
Cæsar, Catullus, Tibullus, and Propertius--to mention only the greatest
names--shows that we are indebted primarily to Gallia Christiana for the
preservation of these authors.
{Transcriber's Note:
Superscript letters are shown as in mathematical notation: ^{L}
The twelve-page transcription retains the page and line breaks of the
original text, representing the manuscript itself.
In a few places the authors used V in place of U. This appears to be
an error, but has not been changed.}
[TRANSCRIPTION] [A]
{fol. 48r}
LIBER·II·
CESSIT UT IPSE MIHI DIXERIT CUM CO_N_
SULERET QUAM CITO SESTERTIUM SESCE_N_
TIES INPLETURUS ESSET INUENISSE SE EX
TA DUPLICATA QUIB_US_ PORTENDI MI^{L}LIES[1] ET
DUCENTIES HABITURUM ET HABEBIT SI
MODO UT COEPIT ALIENA TESTAMENTA
QUOD EST IMPROBISSIMUM GENUS FAL
SI IPSIS QUORUM SUNT ILLA DICTAUERIT
UALE
[2]·C·PLINI·SECUNDI
EPISTULARUM·EXP_LICIT_·LIBER·II.
·INC_IPIT_·LIB_ER_·III·FELICITER[2]
[Footnote A: The original manuscript is in _scriptura continua_. For
the reader’s convenience, words have been separated and punctuation
added in the transcription.]
[Footnote 1: _L_ added by a hand which seems contemporary, if not
the scribe’s own. If the scribe’s, he used a finer pen for
corrections.]
[Footnote 2-2: The colophon is written in rustic capitals, the
middle line being in red.]
{fol. 48v}
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account