A Source-Book of English Social HistoryJones, M. E. Monckton (Mary Evelyn Monckton)
History
A Source-Book of English Social History
Jones, M. E. Monckton (Mary Evelyn Monckton)
Great Britain -- Economic conditions; Great Britain -- Social conditions
In this year, the Prior and Canons of St. Bartholomew’s, ... set up
a new tron, on the vigil of St. Bartholomew, refusing to allow anyone
to weigh except with that tron; and this, in contravention of the
liberties and customs of the City. Wherefore the principal men of the
City, together with their Mayor, Peter Fitz-Alan and a multitude of
the citizens, on the morrow went to the Priory of St. Bartholomew, and
advised the Prior and Canons of that place to make amends for that
act of presumption, and to desist therefrom; whereupon they forthwith
gave up the practice, and by the Mayor and Sheriffs of London it was
published that every man was to sell, buy and weigh in that market,
just as they previously had been wont to do.
JURISDICTION DISPUTED
1247
In the same year ... a Justiciar sent by his lordship the King, came
to St. Martin’s le Grand, to hear the record which had been given upon
the plaint of Margery Vyel, ... in the previous year ...; as to which
judgment the said Margery had made complaint to his lordship the King,
and had found pledges to prove that the same was false.
Whereupon, the Mayor and citizens meeting there, the record having been
read through, and all the writs of his lordship the King which the said
Margery had obtained, having been read and heard, the Justiciar said:
“I do not say that this judgment is false, but the process therein is
faulty, as there is no mention made in this record of summons of the
opponents of the said Margery, and, seeing that John Vyel, her husband,
made a will, it did not pertain to your Court to determine such a plea
as this.” To which the citizens made answer: “There was no necessity to
summon those who had possession of the property of the deceased, for
they were always ready, and proffered to stand trial at suit of the
said Margery in our Court; and besides, we were fully able to entertain
such plea by assent of the two parties, who did not at all claim or
demand the Ecclesiastical Court, and seeing that his lordship the King
by his writ commanded us to determine the same.”
At length, after much altercation ... the Justiciar said that they
must shew all this to the King and his Council, and so they withdrew.
Afterwards, however, and solely for this cause, his lordship the King
took the City into his hand, and by his writ entrusted it to the
custody of William de Haverille and Edward de Westminster, namely, on
the Vigil of St. Bartholomew (24 August); whereupon, the Mayor and
citizens went to the King at Wudestok, and shewed him that they had
done no wrong; but they could not regain his favour....
Afterwards, on the Sunday before the Nativity of St. Mary (8
September), the Mayor and Sheriffs, by leave of the King, received the
City into their hands, and a day was given them to make answer as to
the aforesaid judgment before the King and his Barons.
A.D. 1248
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account