A summary of the history, construction and effects in warfare of the projectile-throwing engines of the ancients, with a treatise on the structure, power and management of Turkish and other Oriental bows of mediæval and later timesPayne-Gallwey, Ralph, Sir
History
A summary of the history, construction and effects in warfare of the projectile-throwing engines of the ancients, with a treatise on the structure, power and management of Turkish and other Oriental bows of mediæval and later times
Payne-Gallwey, Ralph, Sir
Bow and arrow; Engines of war; Military art and science -- History
‘No artist before his time ever had such comprehensive
talents, such profound skill or so discerning a judgment to
explore the depths of every art or science to which he applied
himself.’--JOHN GOULD, _Dictionary of Painters_, 1839.
From the above eulogy we may conclude that the drawings of ancient
siege engines by Leonardo da Vinci are fairly correct.
]
[Page 27]
PART IV
_THE TREBUCHET_
This engine was of much more recent invention than the catapult or the
balista of the Greeks and Romans. It is said to have been introduced
into siege operations by the French in the twelfth century. On the
other hand, the catapult and the balista were in use several centuries
before the Christian Era. Egidio Colonna gives a fairly accurate
description of the trebuchet, and writes of it, about 1280, as though
it were the most effective siege weapon of his time.
The projectile force of this weapon was obtained from the gravitation
of a heavy weight, and not from twisted cordage as in the catapult and
balista.
From about the middle of the twelfth century, the trebuchet in great
measure superseded the catapult. This preference for the trebuchet
was probably due to the fact that it was able to cast stones of about
300 lbs. in weight, or five or six times as heavy as those which the
largest catapults could project.[12]
[12] The catapult had, besides, become an inferior engine
to what it was some centuries before the trebuchet was
introduced, the art of its construction having been
neglected.
The stones thrown by the siege catapults of the time of Josephus would
no doubt destroy towers and battlements, as the result of the constant
and concentrated bombardment of many engines. One huge stone of from
200 to 300 lbs., as slung from a trebuchet, would, however, shake the
strongest defensive masonry.
The trebuchet was essentially an engine for destroying the upper part
of the walls of a fortress, so that it might be entered by means of
scaling ladders or in other ways. The catapult, by reason of its longer
range, was of more service in causing havoc to the people and dwellings
inside the defences of a town.
From experiments with models of good size and from other sources, I
find that the largest trebuchets--those with arms of about 50 ft. in
length and counterpoises of about 20,000 lbs.--were capable of slinging
a stone from 200 to 300 lbs. in weight to a distance of 300 yards, a
range of 350 yards being, in my opinion, more than these engines were
able to attain.[13]
[Page 28]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account