A summary of the history, construction and effects in warfare of the projectile-throwing engines of the ancients, with a treatise on the structure, power and management of Turkish and other Oriental bows of mediæval and later timesPayne-Gallwey, Ralph, Sir
History
A summary of the history, construction and effects in warfare of the projectile-throwing engines of the ancients, with a treatise on the structure, power and management of Turkish and other Oriental bows of mediæval and later times
Payne-Gallwey, Ralph, Sir
Bow and arrow; Engines of war; Military art and science -- History
[13] Egidio Colonna tells us that the trebuchet was sometimes
made without a counterpoise, and that in such a case
the arm of the engine was worked by a number of men
pulling together instead of by a heavy weight. I cannot
believe this, as however many men pulled at the arm of
a trebuchet they could not apply nearly the force that
would be conveyed by the gravitation of a heavy weight.
[Illustration: FIG. 18.--THE TREBUCHET.
The arm is fully wound down and the tackle of the windlass is detached
from it. The stone is in the sling and the engine is about to be
discharged by pulling the slip-hook off the end of the arm. The
slip-hook is similar to the one shown in fig. 10, p. 18.
N.B.--A Roman soldier is anachronistically shown in this picture. The
trebuchet was invented after the time of the Romans.]
[Page 29]
The trebuchet always had a sling in which to place its missile.
The sling doubled the power of the engine and caused it to throw its
projectile twice as far as it would have been able to do without it.
It was the length of the arm, when suitably weighted with its
counterpoise, which combined with its sling gave power to the
trebuchet. Its arm, when released, swung round with a long easy sweep
and with nothing approaching the velocity of the much shorter arm of
the catapult.
The weight of a projectile cast by a trebuchet was governed by the
weight of its counterpoise. Provided the engine was of sufficient
strength and could be manipulated, there was scarcely any limit to its
power. Numerous references are to be found in mediæval authors to the
practice of throwing dead horses into a besieged town with a view to
causing a pestilence therein, and there can be no doubt that trebuchets
alone were employed for this purpose.
As a small horse weighs about 10 cwt., we can form some idea of the
size of the rocks and balls of stone that trebuchets were capable of
slinging.
When we consider that a trebuchet was able to throw a horse over the
walls of a town, we can credit the statement of Stella,[14] who writes
‘that the Genoese armament sent against Cyprus in 1376 had among other
great engines one which cast stones of 12 cwt.’
[14] Stella flourished at the end of the fourteenth century
and beginning of fifteenth. He wrote _The Annals of
Genoa_ from 1298–1409. Muratori includes the writings of
Stella in his great work, _Rerum Italicarum Scriptores_,
25 vols., 1723–38.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account