A summary of the history, construction and effects in warfare of the projectile-throwing engines of the ancients, with a treatise on the structure, power and management of Turkish and other Oriental bows of mediæval and later times — John Shaqi
A summary of the history, construction and effects in warfare of the projectile-throwing engines of the ancients, with a treatise on the structure, power and management of Turkish and other Oriental bows of mediæval and later timesPayne-Gallwey, Ralph, Sir
History
A summary of the history, construction and effects in warfare of the projectile-throwing engines of the ancients, with a treatise on the structure, power and management of Turkish and other Oriental bows of mediæval and later times
Payne-Gallwey, Ralph, Sir
Bow and arrow; Engines of war; Military art and science -- History
[6] _The Crossbow_, _etc._
If the upper end of the arm of a catapult is shaped into a cup to
receive the stone, as shown in fig. 5, p. 11, the arm is, of necessity,
large and heavy at this part.
If, on the other hand, the arm is equipped with a sling, as shown in
fig. 6, opposite page, it can be tapered from its butt-end upwards, and
is then much lighter and recoils with far more speed than an arm that
has an enlarged extremity for holding its missile.
When the arm is fitted with a sling, it is practically lengthened by as
much as the length of the sling attached to it, and this, too, without
any appreciable increase in its weight.
The longer the arm of a catapult, the longer is its sweep through the
air, and thus the farther will it cast its projectile, provided it is
not of undue weight.
The difference in this respect is as between the range of a short sling
and that of a long one, when both are used by a school-boy for slinging
pebbles.
The increase of power conferred by the addition of a sling to the arm
of a catapult is surprising.
A small model I constructed for throwing a stone ball, one pound in
weight, will attain a distance of 200 yards when used with an arm that
has a cup for holding the ball, though when a sling is fitted to the
arm the range of the engine is at once increased to 300 yards.
The only historian who distinctly tells us that the catapult of the
Greeks and Romans had a sling to its arm, is Ammianus Marcellinus. This
author flourished about 380 A.D., and a closer study of his writings,
and of those of his contemporaries, led me to carry out experiments
with catapults and balistas which I had not contemplated when my work
dealing with the projectile engines of the Ancients was published.
[Page 14]
[Illustration: FIG. 7.--CATAPULT (WITH A SLING). Side view of frame and
mechanism.
Scale: ½ in. = 1 ft.]
[Page 15]
Ammianus writes of the catapult[7]:
‘In the middle of the ropes[8] rises a wooden arm like a chariot pole
... to the top of the arm hangs a sling ... when battle is commenced a
round stone is set in the sling ... four soldiers on each side of the
engine wind the arm down till it is almost level with the ground ...
when the arm is set free it springs up and hurls forth from its sling
the stone, which is certain to crush whatever it strikes. This engine
was formerly called the “scorpion,” because it has its sting erect,[9]
but later ages have given it the name of Onager, or wild ass, for when
wild asses are chased they kick the stones behind them.’
[7] _Roman History_, Book XXIII., Chapter IV.
[8] _i.e._ in the middle of the twisted skein formed of ropes
of sinew or hair.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account