A Synopsis of Neotropical Hylid Frogs, Genus OsteocephalusDuellman, William Edward
Science
A Synopsis of Neotropical Hylid Frogs, Genus Osteocephalus
Duellman, William Edward
Frogs -- Ecuador; Osteocephalus
In their account of _Osteocephalus leprieurii_, Cochran and Goin
(1970:323) stated: "The specimen described and illustrated (MCZ 28042)
has been directly compared with the types of _leprieurii_, _planiceps_,
and _vilarsi_ by the junior author and there seems to be no doubt that
all are conspecific. Another specimen (CNHM 69716) has been directly
compared with the types of _planiceps_ and _vilarsi_ and these,
likewise, are considered conspecific." With this justification Cochran
and Goin (1970:322) included _Osteocephalus planiceps_ Cope, 1874, and
_Hyla vilarsi_ Melin, 1941, in the synonymy of _Osteocephalus
leprieurii_.
We do not concur with Cochran and Goin's synonymy and contend that
_planiceps_ and _vilarsi_ are synonyms of _Osteocephalus taurinus_; we
give our reasons in the account of that species. We have examined the
specimens listed as _O. leprieurii_ by Cochran and Goin; several of
them, including CNHM (= FMNH) 69716, are _taurinus_. Thus, due to
Cochran and Goin's confusion of two taxa, their comparisons of certain
specimens with types has little meaning.
Cochran and Goin did not include _Hyla leprieurii britti_ in their
synonymy of _Osteocephalus leprieurii_ but did discuss the name in their
account of _Osteocephalus orcesi_ (= _O. verrucigerus_), as follows
(1970:319): "When we first examined one of the specimens we felt sure
that we had Melin's _Hyla britti_ at hand, but on direct comparison with
the type of _britti_ the two proved to be different. After studying the
type of _orcesi_ (SUNHM 13150) we have no doubt that the specimens at
hand are _orcesi_ and that _britti_ is a different, probably valid
species."
_Diagnosis._--1) Size moderate, sexual dimorphism evident; maximum
observed snout-vent length in males 48.4 mm, in females, 61.5 mm; 2)
skin on dorsum in males bearing numerous, minute, spinous tubercles; 3)
skin on flanks smooth; 4) web extending to base of antepenultimate
phalange on inner edge of third finger; 5) dorsum tan or olive-brown
with transverse brown or olive bars; 6) venter creamy white or pale tan
without markings; 7) lips marked with creamy tan labial stripe and
suborbital spot; 8) flanks pale tan with no markings; 9) dermal roofing
bones of skull lacking exostosis; 10) dermal sphenethmoid absent; 11)
nasals juxtaposed medially; 12) anteromedial margin of frontoparietal
between mid- and anterior levels of orbit; 13) frontoparietal fontanelle
partially exposed; 14) palatine not serrate; 15) parasphenoid lacking
odontoids; 16) zygomatic ramus of squamosal extending about one-half of
distance to maxillary arch; 17) transverse processes of presacral
vertebrae 3-8 about equal in width to one another and to sacral
diapophyses; 18) intermandibularis and submentalis muscles connected;
19) supramandibular portion of interhyoideus forming simple tubular
posterolateral extension; associated skin unmodified.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account