A year of prophesyingWells, H. G. (Herbert George)
History
A year of prophesying
Wells, H. G. (Herbert George)
Civilization, Modern -- 20th century; Europe -- History -- 20th century; Great Britain -- History -- 20th century
It is not yet sufficiently realised, even by the supporters of
Proportional Representation, that a country which returns men because
they are distinctive and significant to its Legislature--and that is
what the adoption of Proportional Representation means--will need an
assembly of a different size and type from the present clumsy crowd
of notables and nobodies at Westminster. There are too many members
of Parliament at Westminster for efficiency, just as there are too
many Congressmen at Washington. They loaf about. They do mischief in
obscurity. They make trouble in order to realise their own existence.
They are to public affairs what excessive fat is to the body of a man.
These big legislative bodies date from a time when group psychology
was not thought of. It is even possible that a big legislative body
elected by Proportional Representation would be a worse evil even
than the party house. Released from the party ties that control them,
bunched into fluctuating groups, the scores and hundreds of unnecessary
members would obstruct and confuse every legislative proposal.
Proportional Representation must mean not only the suppression of the
hack politician, but also the suppression of the commonplace member.
For efficient government we want a Legislature no larger than is
fairly representative of the broad varieties of public opinion. At the
largest we need only from two hundred to three hundred members, a grand
committee of the nation, appointing Ministers severally, assigning
tasks to sub-committees, and expressing the general ideas of the
country. We shall certainly be able to dispense with the rotation of
the “ins and outs” and possibly with the organised Cabinet in such a
Legislature. The adoption of Proportional Representation will be a much
profounder and more revolutionary change than a mere change in voting
procedure. It will necessitate an entirely new type of representative
government. In that lies its importance in the world’s affairs and its
fascination and desirability for most intelligent people.
XL
THE SERFDOM OF IGNORANCE: THE RIGHT OF WOMEN TO KNOWLEDGE
7.6.24
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account