Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856, Vol. 1 (of 16)United States. Congress
History
Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856, Vol. 1 (of 16)
United States. Congress
Law -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
The President of the United States withdrew from the Senate Chamber, and
the Vice President put the question of adjournment; to which the Senate
agreed.
WEDNESDAY, September 16.
The following message from the President of the United States was
received by the Secretary of War.
_Gentlemen of the Senate:_
The Governor of the Western Territory has made a statement
to me of the reciprocal hostilities of the Wabash Indians,
and the people inhabiting the frontiers bordering on the
river Ohio, which I herewith lay before Congress.
The United States, in Congress assembled, by their acts of
the 21st day of July, 1787, and of the 12th August, 1788,
made a provisional arrangement for calling forth the
militia of Virginia and Pennsylvania in the proportions
therein specified.
As the circumstances which occasioned the said arrangement
continue nearly the same, I think proper to suggest to your
consideration the expediency of making some temporary
provision for calling forth the militia of the United
States for the purposes stated in the constitution, which
would embrace the cases apprehended by the Governor of the
Western Territory.
GEO. WASHINGTON.
_September_ 16, 1789.
THURSDAY, September 17.
The Senate entered on executive business.
The following message was received from the President of the United
States:
_Gentlemen of the Senate:_
It doubtless is important that all treaties and compacts
formed by the United States with other nations, whether
civilized or not, should be made with caution and executed
with fidelity.
It is said to be the general understanding and practice of
nations, as a check on the mistakes and indiscretions of
ministers or commissioners, not to consider any treaty
negotiated and signed by such officers as final and
conclusive, until ratified by the sovereign or government
from whom they derive their powers. This practice has been
adopted by the United States respecting their treaties with
European nations, and I am inclined to think it would be
advisable to observe it in the conduct of our treaties with
the Indians; for though such treaties being, on their part,
made by their chiefs or rulers, need not be ratified by
them, yet, being formed on our part by the agency of
subordinate officers, it seems to be both prudent and
reasonable that their acts should not be binding on the
nation until approved and ratified by the Government. It
strikes me that this point should be well considered and
settled, so that our national proceedings, in this respect,
may become uniform, and be directed by fixed and stable
principles.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account