Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856, Vol. 3 (of 16) — John Shaqi
Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856, Vol. 3 (of 16)United States. Congress
History
Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856, Vol. 3 (of 16)
United States. Congress
Law -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
The PRESIDENT communicated a letter from De Witt Clinton, late a Senator
from the State of New York, stating that he had resigned his seat in the
Senate.
MONDAY, November 14.
The PRESIDENT administered the oath required by law to Mr. CONDIT, a
Senator from the State of New Jersey.
TUESDAY, November 15.
Mr. WORTHINGTON presented the petition of a number of the inhabitants of
the Indiana Territory, praying to be set off into a separate district,
for reasons therein stated.
_Ordered_, That it be referred to Mr. BRADLEY and others, the committee
to whom were referred on the 7th instant, petitions on the same subject,
to consider and report thereon to the Senate.
WEDNESDAY, November 23.
_Amendment to the Constitution._
The Senate resumed the consideration of the report of the committee to
whom was referred the motion for an amendment to the constitution in
the mode of electing the President and the Vice President of the United
States; whereupon, the President _pro tem._ (Mr. BROWN) submitted to the
consideration of the Senate the following question of order:
“When an amendment to be proposed to the constitution is
under consideration, shall the concurrence of two-thirds of
the members present be requisite to decide any question for
amendments, or extending to the merits, being short of the
final question?”
[A debate took place on this proposition, tedious, intricate, and
desultory, which it was very difficult to follow, and often to
comprehend.]
The proposition offered by the President was then called up for decision,
whether two-thirds were necessary--ayes 13, noes 18.
Mr. BUTLER desired to know from the President if the question now decided
did not require a majority of two-thirds?
The PRESIDENT said, according to the rule of the House, the question
required only a principal majority to decide.
Mr. DAYTON’s motion for striking out what related to the Vice President
was called for, and the question taken on striking out--ayes 12, noes 19.
The report of the committee at large being then under consideration,
Mr. NICHOLAS moved to strike out all following the seventh line of the
report, to the end, for the purpose of inserting the following:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account