Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856, Vol. 3 (of 16)United States. Congress
History
Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856, Vol. 3 (of 16)
United States. Congress
Law -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
“In all future elections of President and Vice President,
the Electors shall name in their ballots the person voted
for as President, and, in distinct ballots, the person voted
for as Vice President, of whom one at least shall not be an
inhabitant of the same State with themselves. The person voted
for as President, having a majority of the votes of all the
Electors appointed, shall be the President; and if no person
have such majority, then from the three highest on the list
of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives
shall choose the President in the manner directed by the
constitution. The person having the greatest number of votes
as Vice President, shall be the Vice President; and in case
of an equal number of votes for two or more persons for Vice
President, they being the highest on the list, the Senate shall
choose the Vice President from those having such equal number,
in the manner directed by the constitution; but no person
constitutionally ineligible to the office of President, shall
be eligible to that of Vice President of the United States.”
Mr. ADAMS objected to the number “three” instead of five, and wished five
to be restored, as the House of Representatives had already agreed to it.
He asked for a division of the question; which was not agreed to.
Upon the question for striking out being put, it was carried without
a dissenting voice, and the amendment of Mr. NICHOLAS adopted in the
report, leaving the number blank.
Mr. DAYTON moved to fill up the blank with the number five; upon the
question being put, it was lost--only eleven rose in the affirmative.
Mr. ANDERSON moved to strike out the word “two” in the nineteenth
line--ayes 6. Lost.
Mr. S. SMITH then moved to fill the blank with the word “three;” which
was carried--ayes 18, noes 13.
Mr. ADAMS suggested an objection to the amendment as it stood, which
appeared to arise out of the treaty of cession of Louisiana. His
original idea was adverse to the limitation to natural-born citizens,
as superfluous; but, as it stood, the terms upon which Louisiana was
acquired had rendered a change necessary, for it appeared to him that
there was no alternative, but to admit those born in Louisiana as well
as those born in the United States to the right of being chosen for
President and Vice President.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account