Abury, A Temple of the British Druids, With Some Others, Described — John Shaqi
Abury, A Temple of the British Druids, With Some Others, DescribedStukeley, William
History
Abury, A Temple of the British Druids, With Some Others, Described
Stukeley, William
Avebury (England) -- Antiquities; Druids and Druidism
When I first began these studies about the Druid antiquities, I plainly
discern’d, the religion profess’d in these places was the first,
simple, patriarchal religion. Which made me judge it worth while to
prosecute my enquiries about them, as a matter the most interesting
and important. Knowledge is the glory of a man, divine knowledge of a
christian. What I have done in this volume, is a further prosecution of
the scheme I have laid down to this purpose. The noble person to whom
it is dedicated, induc’d me to hasten the publication, suggesting the
shortness of human life, and having a good opinion of the work.
I was willing to lay hold on the first opportunity of communicating to
the world, the pleasure of contemplating so very noble antiquities,
which we enjoy in our own island, before it be too late to see them. My
endeavour in it is to open the times of first planting the world, after
the flood; the propagation of true religion together with mankind; the
deviation into idolatry; the persons that built the several kinds of
patriarchal temples, such as we see here, in the more eastern parts
of the world; the planters of _Great Britain_ in particular; and the
connexion there is between the east and west in matters of religion.
All this shews there was but one religion at first, pure and simple.
_Pausanias in Corinthiac._ writes, “the _Phliasians_, one of the most
ancient colonies in _Greece_, had a very holy temple, in which there
was no image, either openly to be seen, or kept in secret.” He mentions
the like of a grove or temple of _Hebe_, belonging to that people; and
adds, “they give a mystical reason for it.” I guess the mystery to be,
that it was after the first and patriarchal manner. The same author
says _in argol._ “that at _Prona_ is a temple of _Vesta_, no image, but
an altar, on which they sacrifice.” The ancient _Hetruscans_ ordain’d
by a law, that there should be no statue in their temples. _Lucian de
dea Syr._ writes, “the ancient temples in _Egypt_ had no statues.”
_Plutarch, in Numa_, and _Clemens Alexan. strom._ I. remark, “that
_Numa_ the second king of _Rome_, made express orders against the use
of images, in the worship of the deity.” _Plutarch_ adds, “that for the
first 170 years after building the city, the _Romans_ used no images,
but thought the deity to be invisible.” So to the days of _Silius
Italicus_ and _Philostratus_, at the temple of _Hercules_ our planter
of _Britain_, at _Gades_, the old patriarchal method of religion was
observ’d, as bishop _Cumberland_ takes notice, _Sanchoniathon_, p. 266.
_Sed nulla effigies, simulachrave nota deorum._ Silius III.
And our _british_ Druids had no images. And whatever we find in
history, that looks like idolatry in them, is not to be referr’d to the
aboriginal Druids, but to the later colonies from the continent.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account