Accepting the universe : $b Essays in naturalismBurroughs, John
Philosophy
Accepting the universe : $b Essays in naturalism
Burroughs, John
Natural history; Natural history -- Philosophy; Philosophy; Science
Of course there is purpose or design in living things in a sense that
there is not in the non-living. Every part of a living organization
is purposeful. There is purpose in our lungs, our hearts, our
kidneys, in short in every part of our bodies. There is purpose in
the varnish on leaves, in the down and resin on buds, in the wings
and hooks of seeds, in the colors of flowers and of animals, in
fact, in everything that makes for the well-being of living things.
But not in the same sense is there purpose in the wind, the rain,
the snow, the tides, the heat, the cold, the rocks, the soil, the
fountains. Animate nature struggles; inanimate nature passively
submits. Dead matter forever seeks an equilibrium; living matter
forever struggles against an equilibrium. The waters separate the
clay and the sand and the pebbles from the soil and deposit each
in its own place; but it is not a struggle or an effort; it is
mechanical adjustment. It is not an effort for certain liquids to
form crystals, or for certain elements to combine with certain other
elements and form new compounds, but it is an effort for a tree
to resist the wind, to lift up tons of water and minerals against
gravity, to force its roots through the soil or grip the rock, and it
is an effort for the mother to bear and nurse her young. For anything
to live and grow, effort is needful; not commonly a painful effort,
but a joyous one.
So, when we ask, Is there design in Nature? we must make clear what
part or phase of Nature we refer to. Can we say that the cosmos as
a whole shows any design in our human sense of the word? I think
not. The Eternal has no purpose that our language can compass.
There can be neither center nor circumference to the Infinite. The
distribution of land and water on the globe cannot be the result of
design any more than can the shapes of the hills and mountains, or
Saturn’s rings, or Jupiter’s moons. The circular forms and orbits
of the universe must be the result of the laws of matter and force
that prevail in celestial mechanics; this is not a final solution of
the riddle, but is as near as we can come to it. One question stands
on another question, and that on another, and so on, and the bottom
question we can never reach and formulate. The earth rests on nothing
and floats as lightly as a feather. All matter is probably only a
phase of the ether, but the ether defies all proof and all negation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account