Accepting the universe : $b Essays in naturalismBurroughs, John
Philosophy
Accepting the universe : $b Essays in naturalism
Burroughs, John
Natural history; Natural history -- Philosophy; Philosophy; Science
“It was for Beauty that the world was made.” Emerson quotes this
verse from Ben Jonson and says that it is better than any single line
of Tennyson’s “In Memoriam.” Only the poet is allowed to make such
extravagant statements. We cannot in soberness and truth say that
the world was made for any particular end. It is out of a certain
harmony of the elements that we arose and our sense of beauty was
developed, but the world exists for as many ends as we have power to
conceive. Order, harmony, rhythm, compensation, equilibrium, circles,
spheres, are fundamental in nature. Music, which is beauty to the
ear, hath power over inert matter. In the Mammoth Cave the very rocks
will sing if you speak to them in the right key. How steel filings
on a metal surface will dance and arrange themselves in symmetrical
groups under the influence of musical chords! Harmony is at the heart
of nature, but, in the music of creation, disharmony plays a part
also. The world is not all beautiful unless seen as a whole; all its
discords are harmonized in the curve of the sphere. Emerson’s own
line, “Beauty is its own excuse for being,” is better and truer than
the one he quotes from Ben Jonson.
When saying that in the music of creation disharmony plays a part
also, I do not mean to imply that this is not also true in human
music. The dissonances are just as much a part of great music as
are the harmonies. What would the operas of Wagner be without the
tremendous dissonances? That is what makes Wagner one of the greatest
in music; he sees things whole, just as Whitman does in his art--sees
that “all are but parts of one stupendous whole,” and that the merely
pretty in music, in poetry, in any art, as in nature, is only one
little phase of it, only an arc of the great circle.
III
What trouble we get into when we identify God with Nature! and what
trouble we get into when we refuse to identify the two! In the first
case we reach the unity that the mind craves, but it is a unity made
up of those antagonisms which revolt us. In the second case it is a
duality that leaves half of the world to the Devil.
We select what we call the divine and stand confused and abashed
before the residue. We must either change our notion about the power
we call God and make it all-inclusive, embracing evil as well as
good, or else we must change our notion about Nature and see no evil
in her. God and Nature are one. If they are two, who or what is the
second?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account