Albyn; or, Scotland and the futureMacDiarmid, Hugh
History
Albyn; or, Scotland and the future
MacDiarmid, Hugh
Scotland
This is true—but not exactly in the sense the Committee intends.
It will not do to identify Scottish nationality and traditions
wholly with Protestantism. There has always been a considerable
native Catholic population, and most of the finest elements in our
traditions, in our literature, in our national history, come down
from the days when Scotland was wholly Catholic. Neither, in speaking
of a “silent and unostentatious peril” will it do to overlook the
fact that Scotland has been steadily subject to Anglicization ever
since the Union. This, since it does not raise the “religious bogey”
in the way the Irish immigration does, is apt to be overlooked, but
it should have at least as much attention as the other from the
“Scottish” Churches, if at last they are seriously concerned with
Scottish nationalism, and not merely with a sectarian issue. Until
they face the whole issue of Scottish Nationalism and define what
they mean by it and by a national culture, they will be suspected
of merely using the term to cover an interest in special issues
by no means synonymous with it, however importantly they may be
related to it. But the part is not greater than the whole, and an
all-round statesman-like attitude is what is necessary, and should
be forthcoming from a Church that is truly Scottish and has the
deepest interests of Scotland at heart. Nor will these ministerial
protagonists gain anything by suggesting that “Scottish employers of
labour ought to do their utmost to retain their fellow-countrymen at
home.” The suggestion takes no cognizance of economic realities. Nor
is the suggested restriction of immigration any more feasible under
the existing system. It is impossible to discriminate against the
Irish in that way as long as we are co-members of the British Empire.
If anything is to be done it must be along the lines of re-acquiring
Scottish control of Scottish affairs, and more particularly such
a measure of financial autonomy as would enable projects like the
mid-Scotland ship canal, land settlement on a far greater scale, the
creation of co-operative agencies in our agriculture, afforestation
and so forth, to be developed in a way the House of Commons has not
allowed—in short, to undo the present neglect of, and contempt for,
Scottish affairs, and their treatment, where they have had any,
within the limits of alien and inappropriate conceptions, which are
largely responsible for the pass to which we have been brought, and
which cannot be undone until we have once again a Parliament of our
own and are free to move on the axis of our own mentality.
VII
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account