Alcohol: A Dangerous and Unnecessary Medicine, How and Why: What Medical Writers SayAllen, Martha Meir
Science
Alcohol: A Dangerous and Unnecessary Medicine, How and Why: What Medical Writers Say
Allen, Martha Meir
Alcohol -- Physiological effect; Temperance
[Footnote B: Carbuncle.]
"There is in the first instance a slight falling off in weight
of the animal, but after a time this ceases, and the animal may
again become heavier, until the original weight is reached. He
then took a series of animals and vaccinated them against
hydrophobia. In one set the animals were afterwards alcoholized
and then injected with a considerable quantity of virulent rabic
cord. It was here found that immunity against rabies had not
been lost.
"In a second set the vaccination and alcoholization were carried
on simultaneously, a fatal dose (as proved by control
experiment) of rabic cord was then injected, when it was found
that little or no immunity had been acquired. In a third series
the alcohol was stopped before the immunizing process was
commenced. In this case marked immunity was acquired.
"As regards rabies, then, acute alcoholism, especially when
continued for comparatively short periods, simply has the
effect of preventing the acquisition of immunity when alcohol is
administered during the period when the immunizing process ought
to be going on. This indicates that the action of the alcohol in
acute alcoholism is direct, and that although its administration
prevents the acquisition of immunity it does not alter the cells
so materially that they cannot regain some of their original
powers, whilst once the immunity has been gained by the cells,
alcohol cannot, immediately, so fundamentally alter them that
they lose the immunity they have already acquired. When we come
to the consideration of the case of tetanus, however, we are
carried a step further. Dr. Delearde repeating his immunizing
and alcoholizing experiments, but now working with tetanus virus
in place of rabic virus, found--and, perhaps, here it may be as
well to give his own words:--
(1) "'That animals vaccinated against tetanus and afterwards
alcoholized lose their immunity against tetanus;
(2) "'That animals vaccinated against tetanus and at the same
time alcoholized do not readily acquire immunity;
(3) "'That animals first alcoholized and then vaccinated may
acquire immunity against tetanus if alcohol is suppressed from
the commencement of the process of vaccination.'
"In the case of anthrax too, as we gather from another series of
experiments, it is almost impossible to confer immunity, if the
animal is alcoholized during the time that it is being
vaccinated, and although the animals, first alcoholized and then
vaccinated, may acquire a certain amount of immunity, they
rapidly lose condition and are certainly more ill than
non-alcoholized animals vaccinated simultaneously.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account