Poets, English -- 19th century -- Biography; Tennyson, Alfred Tennyson, Baron, 1809-1892
Byron made him _blasé_ at fourteen. Then Byron died, and Tennyson
scratched on a rock “Byron is dead,” on “a day when the whole world
seemed darkened for me.” Later he considered Byron’s poetry “too much
akin to rhetoric.” “Byron is not an artist or a thinker, or a creator in
the higher sense, but a strong personality; he is endlessly clever, and
is now unduly depreciated.” He “did give the world another heart and new
pulses, and so we are kept going.” But “he was dominated by Byron till
he was seventeen, when he put him away altogether.”
In his boyhood, despite the sufferings which he endured for a while at
school at Louth; despite bullying from big boys and masters, Tennyson
would “shout his verses to the skies.” “Well, Arthur, I mean to be
famous,” he used to say to one of his brothers. He observed nature very
closely by the brook and the thundering sea-shores: he was never a
sportsman, and his angling was in the manner of the lover of _The
Miller’s Daughter_. He was seventeen (1826) when _Poems by Two Brothers_
(himself and his brother Frederick) was published with the date 1827.
These poems contain, as far as I have been able to discover, nothing
really Tennysonian. What he had done in his own manner was omitted,
“being thought too much out of the common for the public taste.” The
young poet had already saving common-sense, and understood the public.
Fragments of the true gold are found in the volume of 1830, others are
preserved in the Biography. The ballad suggested by _The Bride of
Lammermoor_ was not unworthy of Beddoes, and that novel, one cannot but
think, suggested the opening situation in _Maud_, where the hero is a
modern Master of Ravenswood in his relation to the rich interloping
family and the beautiful daughter. To this point we shall return. It
does not appear that Tennyson was conscious in _Maud_ of the suggestion
from Scott, and the coincidence may be merely accidental.
_The Lover’s Tale_, published in 1879, was mainly a work of the poet’s
nineteenth year. A few copies had been printed for friends. One of
these, with errors of the press, and without the intended alterations,
was pirated by an unhappy man in 1875. In old age Tennyson brought out
the work of his boyhood. “It was written before I had ever seen Shelley,
though it is called Shelleyan,” he said; and indeed he believed that his
work had never been imitative, after his earliest efforts in the manner
of Thomson and of Scott. The only things in _The Lover’s Tale_ which
would suggest that the poet here followed Shelley are the Italian scene
of the story, the character of the versification, and the extraordinary
luxuriance and exuberance of the imagery. {7} As early as 1868 Tennyson
heard that written copies of _The Lover’s Tale_ were in circulation. He
then remarked, as to the exuberance of the piece: “Allowance must be made
for abundance of youth. It is rich and full, but there are mistakes in
it. . . . The poem is the breath of young love.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account