I. One object to be aimed at is, to make the sum of the
temperaments of all the concords the least possible. Since
experience teaches us that the harshness of a given concord
increases with its temperament, it is obvious that of two systems
which agree in other respects, the best is that in which the sum of
the temperaments is least.
II. When other things are equal, the best adjustment of the
imperfections of the scale is that which diminishes the
harmoniousness of all the different concords proportionally. The
succession of a worse to a better harmony, is justly regarded
by several of the best writers on this subject, as one of the
principal causes of offence to the ear, in instruments imperfectly
tuned.
III. When different chords of the same kind are of unequally
frequent occurrence, there is an advantage, _cæteris paribus_, in
giving the greatest temperament to that which occurs most seldom.
This important consideration has indeed been neglected by Dr.
Smith, in the systems which he recommends, both for his changeable
and the common fixed scale; as it is, also, by the numerous
advocates of the system of equal semitones. But many authors on
temperament, and most instrument-makers, pay a vague regard to it.
Their aim has been, although in a loose and conjectural manner,
to make the prominent chords of the simplest keys the nearest to
perfection, whilst a greater temperament is thrown upon those
which occur only in the more complex keys. Thus Dr. Young, in
the Philos. Trans. for 1800, recommends a scheme which increases
the temperament of the IIIds, on the key note of the successive
keys, as we modulate by fifths from C, nearly in arithmetical
progression. Earl Stanhope assigns as a reason for the small
temperament which is given to several of the IIIds in his system,
that they are on the tonic of the simpler keys. The irregularities
in Mr. Hawkes's scheme may be traced to the same cause. And, with
the instrument-makers, it is a favourite maxim to lay the wolf, as
they term it, where it will be most seldom heard.
But if the above consideration deserves any weight at all, it
deserves to be accurately investigated. Not only ought the relative
frequency of different chords to be ascertained with the greatest
accuracy, of which the nature of the subject is susceptible, but
the degree of weight which this consideration ought to have, when
compared with the two others above-mentioned, should be determined:
for it is plain that neither of them ought to be ever left out of
view.
Accordingly, the principal design of the following propositions
will be to investigate the actual frequency of occurrence of
different chords in practice; and from this and the two other
above-mentioned considerations united, to deduce the best system of
temperament for a scale, containing any given number of sounds to
the octave, and particularly for the common Douzeave, or scale of
twelve degrees.
PROPOSITION I.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account