All consonances may be regarded, without any sensible error in
practice, as equally harmonious in their kinds, when equally
tempered; and when unequally tempered, within certain limits, as
having their harmoniousness diminished in the direct ratio of
their temperaments.
As different consonances, when perfect, are not pleasing to the
ear in an equal degree, some approaching nearer to the nature of
discords than others, so a set of tempered consonances, _cæteris
paribus_, will be best constituted when their harmoniousness
is diminished _proportionally_. Suppose, for example, that the
agreeable effects of the Vth, IIId, and 3d, when perfect, are as
any unequal numbers, _a_, _b_, and _c_; the best arrangement of a
tempered scale, other things being equal, would be, not that in
which the agreeable effect of the Vth was reduced to an absolute
level with that of the IIId, or 3d, but when they were so tempered
that their agreeable effects on the ear might be expressed by
(_m_/_n_)_a_, (_m_/_n_)_b_, and (_m_/_n_)_c_.
That different consonances, in this sense, are equally harmonious
in their kinds, when equally tempered, or, at least, sufficiently
so for every practical purpose, may be illustrated in the following
manner:
[Illustration]
Let the lines AB, _ab_, represent the times of vibration of two
tempered unisons. Whatever be the ratio of AB to _ab_, whether
rational or irrational, it is obvious that the successive
vibrations will alternately recede from and approach each other,
till they very nearly coincide; and, that during one of these
periods, the longer vibration, AB, has gained _one_ of the shorter.
Let the points, A, B, &c. represent the middle of the successive
times of vibration of the lower; and _a_, _b_, &c. those of the
higher of the tempered unisons. Let the arc AGN..VA be a part of a
circle, representing one period of their pulses, and let the points
A, _a_, be the middle points of the times of those vibrations which
approach the nearest to a coincidence. It is obvious that the
dislocations _b_B, _c_C, &c. of the successive pulses, increase
in a ratio which is very nearly that of their distances from A,
or _a_. Now if the pulses exactly coincided, the unisons would be
perfect; and the same would be equally true, if the pulses of the
one bisected, or divided in any other constant ratio, those of
the other; as clearly appears from observation. It is, therefore,
not the absolute magnitude, as asserted by Dr. Smith, but the
_variableness_ of the successive dislocations, B_b_, C_c_, &c.
which renders the imperfect unisons discordant; and the magnitude
of the successive increments of these dislocations is the measure
of the degree of discordance heard in the unisons.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account