American painting and its tradition : $b as represented by Inness, Wyant, Martin, Homer, La Farge, Whistler, Chase, Alexander, SargentVan Dyke, John C.
History
American painting and its tradition : $b as represented by Inness, Wyant, Martin, Homer, La Farge, Whistler, Chase, Alexander, Sargent
Van Dyke, John C.
Painters -- United States; Painting -- United States
In 1876 Whistler was given _carte blanche_ to produce one of his tone
effects in a room at the Leyland house. This afterward became known
as the Peacock Room. It held the picture of the “Princesse du Pays
de la Porcelaine” at one end, was decorated elsewhere with peacocks,
furnished with cabinets of blue-and-white china, and set off with
blue and gold in the walls and ceiling. The idea of the peacocks had
probably come to Whistler from some Japanese master, perhaps Okio, and
the rest of it was his own arrangement of color. The next year was
that of the suit against Ruskin. London laughed and Whistler shortly
thereafter went into bankruptcy. Everything was seized and sold,
bringing little or nothing. The tide was at its lowest ebb, and the
painter was left stranded, but by no means dead or even moribund.
When he had sufficiently recuperated he went off to Venice, where he
gathered a little coterie of admirers about him who referred to him as
“the master,” and where he talked much, and did some etchings and some
pastels on colored paper. The first series of Venetian etchings, twelve
in number, were done in the summer of 1880, and possibly he never went
beyond such plates as “The Rialto,” “The Bridge”, and “The Traghetto.”
They seem the most flawless of his etched work. As for the pastels,
they were largely notes of color, line, or movement, and while charming
as notes, they were not impeccable in drawing. They were never intended
to be realistic in any modern sense; they were, in fact, mere flying
autumn leaves that meant nothing aside from form and color and their
airy lightness.
In November Whistler returned to London, and the sniping and
sharpshooting began again. It was temporarily interrupted by the death
of his mother in January, but soon broke out anew. Portraits were being
painted--that of Duret in evening clothes with a domino on his arm,
and one of Lady Archibald Campbell, called “The Yellow Buskin,” an
“arrangement in black,” being the most notable. “The Yellow Buskin,”
now in the Fairmount Park Gallery, Philadelphia, appeals to many
people as perhaps Whistler’s most spirited and effective portrait, but
London criticism viewed it lightly. The _Morning Advertiser_ said “its
obvious affectations render the work displeasing,” and another critic
stated that “he has placed one of his portraits on an asphalt floor
and against a coal-black background, the whole apparently representing
a dressy woman in an inferno of the worldly.” The public was equally
unconvinced. So in 1884 Whistler mounted the platform at Princes Hall
and in his _Ten O’Clock_ set forth not only his philosophy of art but
his scorn and contempt for almost everybody and everything excepting
art and artists. The lecture created a stir, was repeated at Oxford and
Cambridge, and Whistler became famous as one who could write even if
he could not paint. Oddly enough, his lecture seemed to command more
respect than his pictures, though it had not a tithe of their sincerity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account