An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, Volume 1: MDCXC, Based on the 2nd Edition, Books 1 and 2 — John Shaqi
An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, Volume 1: MDCXC, Based on the 2nd Edition, Books 1 and 2Locke, John
Philosophy
An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, Volume 1: MDCXC, Based on the 2nd Edition, Books 1 and 2
Locke, John
Knowledge, Theory of -- Early works to 1800
18. If such an Assent be a Mark of Innate, then “that one and two are
equal to three, that Sweetness is not Bitterness,” and a thousand the
like, must be innate.
In answer to this, I demand whether ready assent given to a
proposition, upon first hearing and understanding the terms, be a
certain mark of an innate principle? If it be not, such a general
assent is in vain urged as a proof of them: if it be said that it is a
mark of innate, they must then allow all such propositions to be innate
which are generally assented to as soon as heard, whereby they will
find themselves plentifully stored with innate principles. For upon the
same ground, viz. of assent at first hearing and understanding the
terms, that men would have those maxims pass for innate, they must also
admit several propositions about numbers to be innate; and thus, that
one and two are equal to three, that two and two are equal to four, and
a multitude of other the like propositions in numbers, that everybody
assents to at first hearing and understanding the terms, must have a
place amongst these innate axioms. Nor is this the prerogative of
numbers alone, and propositions made about several of them; but even
natural philosophy, and all the other sciences, afford propositions
which are sure to meet with assent as soon as they are understood. That
“two bodies cannot be in the same place” is a truth that nobody any
more sticks at than at these maxims, that “it is impossible for the
same thing to be and not to be,” that “white is not black,” that “a
square is not a circle,” that “bitterness is not sweetness.” These and
a million of such other propositions, as many at least as we have
distinct ideas of, every man in his wits, at first hearing, and
knowing, what the names stand for, must necessarily assent to. If these
men will be true to their own rule, and have assent at first hearing
and understanding the terms to be a mark of innate, they must allow not
only as many innate propositions, as men have distinct ideas; but as
many as men can make propositions wherein, different ideas are denied
one of another. Since every proposition wherein one different idea is
denied of another, will as certainly find assent at first hearing and
understanding the terms as this general one, “It is impossible for the
same thing to be and not to be,” or that which is the foundation of it
and is the easier understood of the two, “The same is not different”;
by which account they will have legions of innate propositions of this
one sort, without mentioning any other. But, since no proposition can
be innate unless the _ideas_ about which it is be innate, this will be
to suppose all our ideas of colours, sounds, tastes, figure, &c.,
innate, than which there cannot be anything more opposite to reason and
experience. Universal and ready assent upon hearing and understanding
the terms is, I grant, a mark of self-evidence; but self-evidence,
depending not on innate impressions, but on something else, (as we
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account