An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, Volume 1: MDCXC, Based on the 2nd Edition, Books 1 and 2Locke, John
Philosophy
An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, Volume 1: MDCXC, Based on the 2nd Edition, Books 1 and 2
Locke, John
Knowledge, Theory of -- Early works to 1800
A child knows not that three and four are equal to seven, till he comes
to be able to count seven, and has got the name and idea of equality;
and then, upon explaining those words, he presently assents to, or
rather perceives the truth of that proposition. But neither does he
then readily assent because it is an innate truth, nor was his assent
wanting till then because he wanted the use of reason; but the truth of
it appears to him as soon as he has settled in his mind the clear and
distinct ideas that these names stand for. And then he knows the truth
of that proposition upon the same ground and by the same means, that he
knew before that a rod and a cherry are not the same thing; and upon
the same ground also that he may come to know afterwards “That it is
impossible for the same thing to be and not to be,” as shall be more
fully shown hereafter. So that the later it is before any one comes to
have those general ideas about which those maxims are; or to know the
signification of those generic terms that stand for them; or to put
together in his mind the ideas they stand for; the later also will it
be before he comes to assent to those maxims;—whose terms, with the
ideas they stand for, being no more innate than those of a cat or a
weasel he must stay till time and observation have acquainted him with
them; and then he will be in a capacity to know the truth of these
maxims, upon the first occasion that shall make him put together those
ideas in his mind, and observe whether they agree or disagree,
according as is expressed in those propositions. And therefore it is
that a man knows that eighteen and nineteen are equal to thirty-seven,
by the same self-evidence that he knows one and two to be equal to
three: yet a child knows this not so soon as the other; not for want of
the use of reason, but because the ideas the words eighteen nineteen,
and thirty-seven stand for, are not so soon got, as those which are
signified by one, two, and three.
17. Assenting as soon as proposed and understood, proves them not
innate.
This evasion therefore of general assent when men come to the use of
reason, failing as it does, and leaving no difference between those
supposed innate and other truths that are afterwards acquired and
learnt, men have endeavoured to secure an universal assent to those
they call maxims, by saying, they are generally assented to as soon as
proposed, and the terms they are proposed in understood: seeing all
men, even children, as soon as they hear and understand the terms,
assent to these propositions, they think it is sufficient to prove them
innate. For, since men never fail after they have once understood the
words, to acknowledge them for undoubted truths, they would infer, that
certainly these propositions were first lodged in the understanding,
which, without any teaching, the mind, at the very first proposal
immediately closes with and assents to, and after that never doubts
again.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account