An Examination of the Testimony of the Four Evangelists, by the Rules of Evidence Administered in Courts of Justice: With an Account of the Trial of JesusGreenleaf, Simon
Religion
An Examination of the Testimony of the Four Evangelists, by the Rules of Evidence Administered in Courts of Justice: With an Account of the Trial of Jesus
Greenleaf, Simon
Apologetics; Authority -- Religious aspects; Bible. Gospels -- Evidences, authority, etc.; Jesus Christ -- Trial
§ 8. That the books of the Old Testament, as we now have them, are
genuine; that they existed in the time of our Saviour, and were commonly
received and referred to among the Jews, as the sacred books of their
religion;(8) and that the text of the Four Evangelists has been handed
down to us in the state in which it was originally written, that is,
without having been materially corrupted or falsified, either by heretics
or Christians; are facts which we are entitled to assume as true, until
the contrary is shown.
The genuineness of these writings really admits of as little doubt, and is
susceptible of as ready proof, as that of any ancient writings whatever.
The rule of municipal law on this subject is familiar, and applies with
equal force to all ancient writing, whether documentary or otherwise; and
as it comes first in order, in the prosecution of these inquiries, it may,
for the sake of mere convenience, be designated as our first rule.
_Every document, apparently ancient, coming from the proper
repository or custody, and bearing on its face no evident marks of
forgery, the law presumes to be genuine, and devolves on the
opposing party the burden of proving it to be otherwise._
§ 9. An ancient document, offered in evidence in our courts, is said to
come from the proper repository, when it is found in the place where, and
under the care of persons with whom, such writings might naturally and
reasonably be expected to be found; for it is this custody which gives
authenticity to documents found within it.(9) If they come from such a
place, and bear no evident marks of forgery, the law presumes that they
are genuine, and they are permitted to be read in evidence, unless the
opposing party is able successfully to impeach them.(10) The burden of
showing them to be false and unworthy of credit, is devolved on the party
who makes that objection. The presumption of law is the judgment of
charity. It presumes that every man is innocent until he is proven guilty;
that everything has been done fairly and legally, until it is proved to
have been otherwise; and that every document, found in its proper
repository, and not bearing marks of forgery, is genuine. Now this is
precisely the case with the Sacred Writings. They have been used in the
church from time immemorial, and thus are found in the place where alone
they ought to be looked for. They come to us, and challenge our reception
of them as genuine writings, precisely as Domesday Book, the Ancient
Statutes of Wales, or any other of the ancient documents which have
recently been published under the British Record Commission, are received.
They are found in familiar use in all the churches of Christendom, as the
sacred books to which all denominations of Christians refer, as the
standard of their faith. There is no pretence that they were engraven on
plates of gold and discovered in a cave, nor that they were brought from
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account